[OpenSIPS-Users] RTPProxy for users behind NAT.
qasimakhan at gmail.com
qasimakhan at gmail.com
Thu May 9 14:54:23 CEST 2013
Hi Razvan,
My scenerio is like this
Client <-------> NAT <-------> OpenSIPs/RTPProxy <-------> Client
in this scenerio left side of OpenSIPs is public side and the right side is
on private network. Secondly i have tried using rtpproxy_offer/answer() but
the same problem. I will try using rtpproxy_offer/answer() again in a bit
more detail now specially after hearing about problems in engage_rtpproxy
in brigding mode. Now can you point me how i can achieve nat handling in
rtpproxy module?
Regards,
Qasim
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Răzvan Crainea <razvan at opensips.org> wrote:
> Hi, Qasim!
>
> There are two problems with your approach: the first one is that you are
> using the engage_rtp_proxy() function in a bridging mode scenario. The
> behavior of this is undefined, because the rtpproxy module cannot fully
> determine your scenario (for example what's the direction of the media flow
> in the reply). That's why you should use the rtpproxy_offer() and
> rtpproxy_answer() functions to explicitly indicate the direction in INVITE
> and replies.
> The second problem is that you try to change the SDP twice: first by the
> fix_nated_sdp() and then by engage_rtp_proxy(). These changes confuse
> OpenSIPS, who tries to apply both of them. Try to use only one. My
> suggestion is to rtpproxy_offer/answer() to fix the SDP, without calling
> fix_nated_sdp().
>
> Best regards,
>
> Razvan Crainea
> OpenSIPS Core Developer
> http://www.opensips-solutions.**com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com>
>
>
> On 05/09/2013 02:33 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>
>> It's not a bug, many of us here use RTP proxy in the same scenario.
>> Can you please provide a sip trace using ngrep
>> (http://wiki.freeswitch.org/**wiki/Packet_Capture<http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Packet_Capture>).
>> Secondly, post the
>> relevant far end nat related scripting please.
>>
>>
>> Nick.
>>
>> On 5/9/13, qasimakhan at gmail.com <qasimakhan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am facing a problem when a client connects to opensips from NATed
>>> network. I am using rtpproxy in bridging mode i.e. from publicnetwork to
>>> private network. When i use fix_nated_sdp function from nathelper the
>>> local
>>> IP address of the caller is replaced by its public IP but the problem
>>> starts when i use engage_rtp_proxy instead of replacing server's public
>>> ip
>>> to private it embeds private ip after the caller's publicIP like
>>> X.X.X.XY.Y.Y.Y. I have tried fix_nated_ip with flag 3 and
>>> engage_rtp_proxy
>>> with flag rie.
>>>
>>> The question is am i using something wrong here or should it be counted
>>> as
>>> a bug.
>>>
>>> If you want some more clarification can draw a flow diagram also.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Qasim
>>>
>>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130509/c7c4c31f/attachment.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list