[OpenSIPS-Users] Record-routing & failover (drouting)

[Max Mühlbronner]

Hi,

thanks very much for your reply. That's also what i thought, first it 
was just a siptrace where opensips sends to the second gw but the invite 
got no Record-route header.

But later on, I was able to reproduce the problem and when adding 
another record_route() the second invite is indeed fixed (contains a 
record-route header)? Maybe there is some other reason for this behavior 
i am not seeing yet?


Best Regards

Max M.

On 03/14/2013 05:35 PM, Muhammad Shahzad wrote:
> No, I think the serial forked invite contains same RR and in general 
> all changes you did to original invite just before creating the 
> transaction (by calling t_newtrans or t_relay or any t_* function that 
> creates transaction).
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Max Mühlbronner <mm at 42com.com 
> <mailto:mm at 42com.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I am not sure about record-routing in combination with failover of
>     drouting. Maybe someone knows for sure :)
>
>     If i got a configuration where i am record_routing on inital
>     invite, but later there is a failover (use_next_gw() returns true)
>     and the call is sent to the next gateway. But the serial forked
>     call (second INVITE) is missing the Record-route header?
>
>
>     Does this mean i just have to explicitly call record routing again
>     on failover? But to me it seems like this can't be right, or is
>     this correct/expected behaviour?
>
>     |
>
>     if (use_next_gw()) {
>     ...
>     record_route();
>
>     |}
>
>
>
>     Best Regards
>
>     -- 
>     Max Mühlbronner
>
>     42com Telecommunication GmbH
>     Straße der Pariser Kommune 12-16
>     10243 Berlin
>
>     E-Mail:mm at 42com.com  <mailto:mm at 42com.com>
>     Web:www.42com.com  <http://www.42com.com>
>
>     Firmenangaben/Company information:
>     Handelsregister/Commercial register: Amtsgericht Berlin HRB 99071 B
>     Umsatzsteuer-ID/VAT-ID: DE223812306
>     Geschäftsführer/CEO: Thomas Reinig, Alexander Reinig
>
>     Diese E-Mail enthält Informationen von 42com Telecommunication GmbH. Diese sind möglicherweise vertraulich und ausschließlich für den Adressaten bestimmt. Sollten Sie diese elektronische Nachricht irrtümlicherweise erhalten haben, so informieren Sie uns bitte unverzüglich telefonisch oder per E-Mail.
>
>     This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us immediately.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Users mailing list
>     Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>     http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> Muhammad Shahzad
> -----------------------------------
> CISCO Rich Media Communication Specialist (CRMCS)
> CISCO Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
> Cell: +49 176 99 83 10 85
> MSN: shari_786pk at hotmail.com <mailto:shari_786pk at hotmail.com>
> Email: shaheryarkh at googlemail.com <mailto:shaheryarkh at googlemail.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130315/62d65142/attachment.htm>