[OpenSIPS-Users] [RFC] migration to GIT

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

On 02/19/2013 02:36 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
>> When comes to SF versus GITHUB - the main problem from my perspective is that SF overs a unified (one account) for tracker, forums, downloads, code repo.....If we move code repo to GITHUB, we will force the developer to use 2 accounts (on SF for tracker, forum , etc, and one on GITHUB for GIT only)..
>>
> I guess my original suggestion was not clear then :-) I was suggesting to completely move from SF. Just add a pointer to GH.
>
>> For manageability reasons I would prefer to have a place hosting everything.
>>
> Agreed.
>
>> What options I see:
>>
>> 1) move everything (tracker + GIT and the rest ?) on GITHUB
>>
> What would the rest be?
>
>> 2) keep SF as primary GIT repo and GITHUB can be a secondary. Developers can use the SF accounts for everything and use GITHUB as an interface to the community (changes, pull requests, etc)..
>>
> The problem I see here is that there would be a split so it could potentially be confusing. When a user sends a pull request, and issue is automatically created, so there would be two places for issues :-S
>
> Having GitHub not as the primary repo is not so nice because pull requests can't be disabled, so people could think that that is the place to contribute code :-S
>
> So, I think the two choices become:
>
> - Move everything to GH and have a read-only mirror somewhere (SF, BitBucket, self hosted, ...)
> - Stick to SF
>
> Personally I'd go for GitHub. In case there is anything I can do to help, whatever the choice is, don't hesitate to ask :-)

Currently, what we use from SF :
          - code repository
          - file download system
          - trackers (bugs, patches, features)
          - news system
          - donation system
          - forums

could all these be replaced kept while moving to GH ? I mean is GH a 
platform for complete hosting of projects ?

Regards,
Bogdan