[OpenSIPS-Users] topology hiding and contact header

[Brett Nemeroff]

Bogdan,
Thanks for this! This confirms my belief. Hopefully the static userpart
will meet the carrier's need. If it doesn't, would it be complicated to
preserve the original userpart?

Thanks for your help!
-Brett


On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>wrote:

> **
> Hi Brett,
>
> 1) a SIP URI without username is perfect valid.
>
> 2) as Contact URI is just for IP routing purposes, a username part is
> totally useless.
>
> 3) preserving the username may "leak" topo info (you never know what is
> the username content).
>
> 4) see the simple attached patch to force a static dummy username.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
>
> On 02/05/2013 11:09 AM, Brett Nemeroff wrote:
>
> Hello All,
> I noticed that when invoking topology_hiding from the dialog module that
> the contact header is rewritten without a userpart in the URI. I've had
> some carriers complain about the lack of a userpart. What is the reasoning
> for removing the userpart of the URI and is there any way to safely add it
> back without breaking in-dialog requests?
>
>  Thanks,
> Brett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130205/efdae5c1/attachment.htm>