[OpenSIPS-Users] [Re: Routing problem with Record-Route]

[Binan AL Halabi]

Hi Bogdan,

as that FQDN is in opensips domain table or  alias, thats why the opensips considerd it as internal domain , Is that correct?
It should be only in the domain table of the opensips responsible for that customer.

thanks
//Binan

--- On Fri, 8/31/12, Hubert Mickael <mickael at winlux.fr> wrote:

From: Hubert Mickael <mickael at winlux.fr>
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [Re: Routing problem with Record-Route]
To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" <users at lists.opensips.org>
Cc: "Binan AL Halabi" <binanalhalabi at yahoo.com>
Date: Friday, August 31, 2012, 12:18 PM





  


Hi,

Yes, CUSTOMER_DEVICE_SIP_DOMAIN is insert to "domain" table in
opensips's database.



Le 31/08/2012 15:48, Binan AL Halabi a écrit :

  
    
      
        Hi,

Is CUSTOMER_DEVICE_SIP_DOMAIN defined in opensips ?

        

//Binan

        

--- On Fri, 8/31/12, Kevin Mathy <k.mathy at hexanet.fr>
wrote:

        

From: Kevin Mathy <k.mathy at hexanet.fr>

Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [Re: Routing problem with Record-Route]

To: "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <bogdan at opensips.org>, "OpenSIPS users
mailling list" <users at lists.opensips.org>

Date: Friday, August 31, 2012, 5:53 AM

          

          Hi
Bogdan, 
          

          
          We've
got some news about our problem with record-routes.
           
          In
fact, it seems that if we change Contact header sent by customer's
device, everything work fine. Explanations :
          

          
          Before,
in all message sent by customer's device, particularly 200OK, Contact
header was like Contact:
<sip:+333XXXXXXXX at CUSTOMER_DEVICE_SIP_DOMAIN>
          In
this situation, OpenSIPS was unable to route correctly ACK messages
following this 200OK.
          

          
          Then,
we've change the manner which Contact header is sent, and now it's like Contact:
<sip:+333XXXXXXXX at CUSTOMER_DEVICE_IP>
          And
in this situation, everything seems to be OK, all message, including
ACK, are correctly routed.
          

          
          Further,
we are sure that DNS resolution of CUSTOMER_SIP_DOMAIN returns exactly
CUSTOMER_DEVICE_IP, so, it doesn't seems to be a DNS resolution
problem...
          

          
          If
it can help you !
          

          
          Thanks
a lot, 
          

          
          Kevin MATHY
          HEXANET
          
          --
          
          Téléphone : 03.26.79.30.05
          Web : www.hexanet.fr
          

          
          Pour toute demande de support, merci de contacter le 03.51.08.42.07,
ou bien d'adresser un e-mail à support at hexanet.fr
          

          
          

          

          

          2012/8/29 <mickael at winlux.fr>

          Hi
Bogdan,

we will do this debug before end of week or begin of next week and we
will

send our results.

            

bye

            

> Hi Kevin,

>

> This looks like OpenSIPS does not recognize the Route as its own
IPs and

> also seeing the next hop as a strict router.

>

> To sort this out in the fastest way, see my prev request on the
logs for

> ACK processing (with the debug=6).

>

> Regards,

>

> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer

> http://www.opensips-solutions.com

>

>

> On 08/28/2012 03:22 PM, Kevin Mathy wrote:

>> Hi Bogdan,

>>

>> I'm working with Mickael about this problem, and we have some

>> informations which may help you (and then help us ;-) ) :

>>

>> We have found that "loose_route" function modify the
Request-URI

>> variable ($ru), as you can see below :

>>

>> ACK message comes from provider, with $ru = sip:+333XXXXXXXX at 6.6.6.6

            
>> <mailto:sip%3A%2B333XXXXXXXX at 6.6.6.6>

            >> After, loose_route
function is executed, and $ru become like $ru

>> =

>>
sip:7.7.7.7;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-503ca77b-ef8c9eef-760f27a5;xyz=c12.18aedaa5

>>

>> The last $ru value results from a Route header

>>

>> For information, Record-route of previous message (200OK) is
composed

>> with two record-route in the same field, comma separated.

>> Is Opensips 1.6.4 able to interpret this type of Record-route ?

>>

>> Is loose_route function using Route headers of previous
messages

>> (200OK before ACK) to route this message ? Or is it using only
actual

>> message's Route headers ?

>>

>> Thanks in advance,

>> If you need further informations, feel free to ask us.

>>

>> Regards,

>>

            
>> *Kevin MATHY*

>> *HEXANET*

>> *

>> --

>> *

>> Téléphone : 03.26.79.30.05

>> Web : www.hexanet.fr <http://www.hexanet.fr>

>>

>> Pour toute demande de support, merci de contacter le
*03.51.08.42.07*,

>> ou bien d'adresser un e-mail à *support at hexanet.fr

>> <mailto:support at hexanet.fr>

          
          
          
          

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

          

          _______________________________________________

Users mailing list

          Users at lists.opensips.org

          http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

          
        
        
      
    
  
  
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
  





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120831/298a2591/attachment-0001.htm>