[OpenSIPS-Users] High Volume MediaProxy

Jeff Pyle jpyle at fidelityvoice.com
Mon Oct 1 21:48:43 CEST 2012


Muhammad,

I don't have the requirements that Afshin does, but I've often wondered
which server resource (ignoring bandwidth) would run out first.  Around 650
calls gives a load average of about 0.15.  This particular relay has one
processor with 8 cores at 2 GHz, Mediaproxy 2.4.4, no virtualization.  RAM
utilization is negligible.

If CPU load would become the bottleneck, can I truly run 650 / 0.15 * 8
cores = 35,000 calls on one relay?  Continuing to ignore bandwidth that
still doesn't seem right.

Once a relay fails due to over-utilization, which actual resource tends to
fill first?


- Jeff


On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Muhammad Shahzad <shaheryarkh at googlemail.com
> wrote:

> OR, if you can arrange an ESX with really good specs (2 x quad core 3.2
> GHz processor with at least 32 GB RAM) then you can create about 8 virtual
> servers running media proxy, the capacity of each media proxy in this case
> will be reduced to around 750~900 concurrent calls but total output of this
> single physical machine would be 750 x 8 = 6000 calls, you will need at
> least 4 gigabit ethernets of course.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Muhammad Shahzad <
> shaheryarkh at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> If you really have this many calls, then you should probably consider
>> distributed media proxies perhaps over different geographical locations. If
>> you have done everything perfect then one media proxy would approx. do
>> 1000-1250 concurrent calls over 100 mbps link this may get double if you
>> have have 1 gbps link but not more then that. So you will need around 6 to
>> 8 media proxies to handle 10K concurrent calls.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Ali Pey <alipey at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Afshin,
>>>
>>> I take it that you need to proxy both the sip signalling and media. I
>>> don't think you can do that on one server. One opensips server can do the
>>> signalling but you would need additional servers for media proxy.
>>>
>>> Consider direct media path so you won't have to use a media proxy.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ali Pey
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:19 AM, afshin afzali <a.afzali2003 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>
>>>> I'm looking for a solution for traversing 10,000 concurrent sessions
>>>> (no encryption).
>>>> Is it possible this on a single modern box by MediaProxy ?
>>>>
>>>> BEST,
>>>> -- afshin
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Muhammad Shahzad
>> -----------------------------------
>> CISCO Rich Media Communication Specialist (CRMCS)
>> CISCO Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
>> Cell: +92 334 422 40 88
>> MSN: shari_786pk at hotmail.com
>> Email: shaheryarkh at googlemail.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Muhammad Shahzad
> -----------------------------------
> CISCO Rich Media Communication Specialist (CRMCS)
> CISCO Certified Network Associate (CCNA)
> Cell: +92 334 422 40 88
> MSN: shari_786pk at hotmail.com
> Email: shaheryarkh at googlemail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121001/dbf1023f/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list