[OpenSIPS-Users] [OpenSIPS-Devel] [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.9.0 major release
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bogdan at opensips.org
Mon Nov 5 19:45:41 CET 2012
right :)
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 11/05/2012 08:40 PM, Duane Larson wrote:
> Yeah. What you mention in your email to Ali would work for the
> scenarios I mention "if there was a function to add a call to a
> gateway's resource (maybe based on the IP address) without calling the
> load_balance() function"
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi Duane,
>
> More or less is the same (forcing a call as load for a destination
> without actually doing LB) - in your case, what is different is
> the way you identify the destination - But if I'm not wrong, using
> the IP of the destination should work in both cases (when call
> comes form GW with IP X and when you force routing to GW with IP X).
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
>
> On 11/05/2012 05:27 PM, Duane Larson wrote:
>> Ali,
>>
>> Just to add to the scenarios when you don't use load balancer but
>> want to keep up with load.....
>>
>> If you are load balancing to Asterisk servers but you don't use
>> the load_balance() function because you want an "attended
>> transfer" or someone is call for a "Parked Call". You want to
>> make sure the call goes to the Asterisk server that has the
>> current call for an Attended Transfer or the call goes to the
>> Asterisk server that has the parked call.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Ali Pey <alipey at gmail.com
>> <mailto:alipey at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Not sure if this is the right place to suggest changes/new
>> features. I have a request for a new function for the
>> load_balancer module.
>>
>> Load_balancer knows how many resources are available for each
>> gateway and keeps track of active calls for each resource to
>> distribute the calls accordingly. This works well if the
>> gateways's calls always go through the load_balancer module.
>> However, this is not always the case.
>>
>> Let's say I have a number of gateways for termination and I
>> use the load_balancer module to distribute the calls. If
>> there happen to be some outgoing calls from these gateways,
>> load balancer would not know about them and the number of
>> active calls and available resources would be inaccurate.
>>
>> This can be fixed if there was a function to add a call to a
>> gateway's resource (maybe based on the IP address) without
>> calling the load_balance() function.
>>
>> This functionality can also be used when you are using
>> resources of one of your gateways but outside the load
>> balancer module such as routing a test number to a particular
>> gateway and so on.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ali Pey
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> *--*--*--*--*--*
>> Duane
>> *--*--*--*--*--*
>> --
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> *--*--*--*--*--*
> Duane
> *--*--*--*--*--*
> --
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121105/f5f96a10/attachment.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list