[OpenSIPS-Users] [OpenSIPS-Devel] [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.9.0 major release

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at opensips.org
Mon Nov 5 19:30:21 CET 2012


Hi Duane,

More or less is the same (forcing a call as load for a destination 
without actually doing LB) - in your case, what is different is the way 
you identify the destination - But if I'm not wrong, using the IP of the 
destination should work in both cases (when call comes form GW with IP X 
and when you force routing to GW with IP X).

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 11/05/2012 05:27 PM, Duane Larson wrote:
> Ali,
>
> Just to add to the scenarios when you don't use load balancer but want 
> to keep up with load.....
>
> If you are load balancing to Asterisk servers but you don't use the 
> load_balance() function because you want an "attended transfer" or 
> someone is call for a "Parked Call".  You want to make sure the call 
> goes to the Asterisk server that has the current call for an Attended 
> Transfer or the call goes to the Asterisk server that has the parked call.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Ali Pey <alipey at gmail.com 
> <mailto:alipey at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hello All,
>
>     Not sure if this is the right place to suggest changes/new
>     features. I have a request for a new function for the
>     load_balancer module.
>
>     Load_balancer knows how many resources are available for each
>     gateway and keeps track of active calls for each resource to
>     distribute the calls accordingly. This works well if the
>     gateways's calls always go through the load_balancer module.
>     However, this is not always the case.
>
>     Let's say I have a number of gateways for termination and I use
>     the load_balancer module to distribute the calls. If there happen
>     to be some outgoing calls from these gateways, load balancer would
>     not know about them and the number of active calls and available
>     resources would be inaccurate.
>
>     This can be fixed if there was a function to add a call to a
>     gateway's resource (maybe based on the IP address) without calling
>     the load_balance() function.
>
>     This functionality can also be used when you are using resources
>     of one of your gateways but outside the load balancer module such
>     as routing a test number to a particular gateway and so on.
>
>     Regards,
>     Ali Pey
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Users mailing list
>     Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>     http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> --
> *--*--*--*--*--*
> Duane
> *--*--*--*--*--*
> --
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121105/bee87c35/attachment.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list