[OpenSIPS-Users] Value of PATH is not being used in next_branches() in Faliure Route

[Gomtesh Jain]

Hi Bogdan,
      When I do serialize_branches(1) after look up , I can see both the
contacts in logs with proper PATH values (*50.16.212.126:8060*).
But It process 1st contact properly but after next_branches() it does not
process 2nd branch properly . It does not add *50.16.212.126:8060;lr *as
route.

Jun  8 11:39:55 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18491]: DBG:core:
*serialize_branches: Msg information
<sip:855_1_7agentsURI at 115.252.66.182:3912
;transport=TCP,sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr,<sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr>,-1,0>*
Jun  8 11:39:55 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]:
DBG:core:parse_headers: via found, flags=2
Jun  8 11:39:55 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18491]: DBG:core:
*serialize_branches: Branch information
<sip:855_1_7agentsURI at 122.177.144.180:2043
;transport=TCP,sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr,<sip:50.16.212.126:8060;lr>,-1,0>*
Jun  8 11:39:55 ip-10-122-214-174 /usr/local/sbin/opensips[18490]:
DBG:core:parse_headers: this is the first via


Thanx,
Gomtesh

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>wrote:

> **
> Hi Gomtesh,
>
> Do your saved contacts contain a PATH field at all ? check with
> "opensipsctl ul show" to see if the path was stored in usrloc cache.
>
> Maybe your problem is not at "lookup" time, but rather at "save" time.
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
>
> On 06/11/2012 10:56 AM, Gomtesh Jain wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>    I am using opensips 1.6 . I am facing an issue here . It seems In
> faliure route when I do next_branches() it does not set value of "path"
> (from lookup) as distination/route . Which results , opensips try to send
> message directly to UA .
>
> Here I give N/w diagram
>
>    UA1(115.X.X.X)-------[PROXY]--------|
>   |
>                                                           |
> Registrar/Opensips   |
>   UA2 (122.x.x.x)--------[PROXY]-------|
> |
>
>
>  The issue I am facing is ...
> 1. On any INVITE to Opensips after lookup Opensips sends invite to Proxy
> 2. On any faliure response in "Faiure Route"
> 3. When I do next_branches() it tries to send INVITE directly to 122.X.X.X
> .
>
>  -----------------HERE I GIVE PIECE OF Opnesips.cfg--------------------
>
>
>         xlog("L_NOTICE", "SERIALIZE BRANCHES ($rm) r-uri ($ru) : Contact
> : $ct  :callID $ci : CSeq $cs \n");
>                         if (!serialize_branches(1)){
>                                 sl_send_reply("500","Unable to load
> contacts");
>                                 exit;
>                         }else{
>                       xlog("L_NOTICE", "PREPARE FIRST BRANCH ($rm) r-uri
> ($ru) : Contact : $ct  :callID $ci : CSeq $cs \n");
>                                 if (next_branches()){
>                                     xlog("L_NOTICE", "NEXT BRANCH After
> Seri :callID $ci : CSeq $cs \n");
>                                         t_on_failure("1");
>                                 }
>                                 #else{
>                                 #       sl_send_reply("504","Not found ");
>                                 #       exit;
>                                 #}
>                         }
>                         append_hf("P-hint: lcr applied\r\n");
>
>                  }else{
>                         append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n");
>                 }
>
>          };
>
>          route(1);
> }
>
>  route[1] {
>
>
>          if (nat_uac_test("7")) {
>             fix_nated_contact();
>         };
>         # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably
>         # even for UDP2TCP
>         xlog("L_NOTICE", " IN ROUTE BLOCK method ($rm) r-uri ($rs) :callID
> $ci \n");
>         if (!t_relay()) {
>                 sl_reply_error();
>         };
>         t_on_reply("1");
>         exit;
> }
>
>  onreply_route[1]{
>   xlog("L_NOTICE", " ON REPLY BLOCK  method ($rm) r-uri ($rs) :callID $ci
> :CSeq $cs \n");
> }
>
>
>
>  failure_route[1] {
>    if ( t_check_status("404|477|408|486|50[234]")){
>                 xlog("L_NOTICE", " ERROR RESPONSE MATCHED  method ($rm)
> r-uri ($rs) :callID $ci :CSeq $cs \n");
>          if (next_branches())
>          {
>                 xlog("L_NOTICE", " ON FAILURE BLOCK  method ($rm) r-uri
> ($rs) :callID $ci :CSeq $cs \n");
>                 t_on_failure("1");
>                 route(1);
>
>           }
>
>      }
> }
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  I attach the log of the call in debug=9 mode.
>
>
>  Please have a look at this if anyone can help me .
>
>  Thanx,
> Gomtesh
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120611/65974671/attachment-0001.htm>