[OpenSIPS-Users] public ip issue with sip provider
Sammy Govind
govoiper at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 08:58:24 CET 2012
Hi again,
I guess for RTPproxy servers you need to have public IPs, to reduce the
failure risks you can run multiple instances of RTpproxys on different
ports managing separate port-ranges.
Media-Servers/asterisks on the other hand don't need to be on public IPs.
Regards.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Matt Hamilton <mistral9999 at hotmail.com>wrote:
> Thanks Sammy. Multiple rtpproxies seems like a good solution. I will also
> look into binding the nics on the opensips server for more bandwidth.
>
> I thought the design I described below is common. Is it really unnecessary
> to make all those servers public? I'm sure they will give me an 8 or 16 IP
> block if I insist/ask for it.
>
> Regards,
> Matt
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 19:06:32 +0500
> From: govoiper at gmail.com
> To: users at lists.opensips.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] public ip issue with sip provider
>
>
> Hi,
>
> If you want to load balance the rtp traffic then you can setup multiple
> rtpproxy instances and rtpproxy module would do load balancing of
> RTPproxies for you,there wont be any bottle neck !
>
> http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/rtpproxy.html#id247996
>
> Regards,
> Sammy.
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Matt Hamilton <mistral9999 at hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have an Opensips server dispatching to 3 Asterisk servers. I would like
> to assign public IPs to all of these servers and avoid NAT altogether -
> phones will also have public IPs. The way I set this in the lab, all the
> SIP traffic goes thru the SIP proxy (Opensips) and RTP goes directly
> between the Asterisk servers and the UAs.
>
> The issue is that our provider (they will be both sip trunk and internet
> access provider for us) wants to assign us only 1 public IP on their voice
> network - they are saying that the above design is unusual. I'm new to
> this, is it?
>
> If we end up getting only 1 public IP, I assume putting all behind NAT (or
> assigning the public IP to opensips and putting the asterisk servers behind
> NAT) will do it. rtpproxy is also setup on the Opensips server just in case
> - I can use it to force the RTP traffic thru the sip proxy. Any other way?
>
> All I want to do is load balance the RTP traffic, avoid any unnecessay
> processing and bottlenecks (rtpproxy, etc.).
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120109/63ff4f76/attachment.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list