[OpenSIPS-Users] [Re: Routing problem with Record-Route]
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bogdan at opensips.org
Fri Aug 31 15:47:12 CEST 2012
Funny...actually the problem was not that you had a FQDN in domain
contact, but because that FQDN was considered by opensips as a local domain.
So, when openspis received the ACK with that contact in RURI, opensips
thought is it his RR header and was acting as prev hop being a strict
router....and this was messing up the entire routing.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 08/31/2012 03:53 PM, Kevin Mathy wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> We've got some news about our problem with record-routes.
> In fact, it seems that if we change Contact header sent by customer's
> device, everything work fine. Explanations :
>
> Before, in all message sent by customer's device, particularly 200OK,
> Contact header was like *Contact:
> <sip:+333XXXXXXXX at CUSTOMER_DEVICE_SIP_DOMAIN>*
> In this situation, OpenSIPS was unable to route correctly ACK messages
> following this 200OK.
>
> Then, we've change the manner which Contact header is sent, and now
> it's like *Contact: <sip:+333XXXXXXXX at CUSTOMER_DEVICE_IP>*
> And in this situation, everything seems to be OK, all message,
> including ACK, are correctly routed.
>
> Further, we are sure that DNS resolution of CUSTOMER_SIP_DOMAIN
> returns exactly CUSTOMER_DEVICE_IP, so, it doesn't seems to be a DNS
> resolution problem...
>
> If it can help you !
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> *Kevin MATHY*
> *HEXANET*
> *
> --
> *
> Téléphone : 03.26.79.30.05
> Web : www.hexanet.fr <http://www.hexanet.fr>
>
> Pour toute demande de support, merci de contacter le *03.51.08.42.07*,
> ou bien d'adresser un e-mail à *support at hexanet.fr
> <mailto:support at hexanet.fr>*
>
>
>
>
> 2012/8/29 <mickael at winlux.fr <mailto:mickael at winlux.fr>>
>
> Hi Bogdan,
> we will do this debug before end of week or begin of next week and
> we will
> send our results.
>
> bye
>
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > This looks like OpenSIPS does not recognize the Route as its own
> IPs and
> > also seeing the next hop as a strict router.
> >
> > To sort this out in the fastest way, see my prev request on the
> logs for
> > ACK processing (with the debug=6).
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> > http://www.opensips-solutions.com
> >
> >
> > On 08/28/2012 03:22 PM, Kevin Mathy wrote:
> >> Hi Bogdan,
> >>
> >> I'm working with Mickael about this problem, and we have some
> >> informations which may help you (and then help us ;-) ) :
> >>
> >> We have found that "loose_route" function modify the Request-URI
> >> variable ($ru), as you can see below :
> >>
> >> ACK message comes from provider, with $ru =
> sip:+333XXXXXXXX at 6.6.6.6 <mailto:sip%3A%2B333XXXXXXXX at 6.6.6.6>
> >> <mailto:sip%3A%2B333XXXXXXXX at 6.6.6.6
> <mailto:sip%253A%252B333XXXXXXXX at 6.6.6.6>>
> >> After, loose_route function is executed, and $ru become like $ru
> >> =
> >>
> sip:7.7.7.7;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-503ca77b-ef8c9eef-760f27a5;xyz=c12.18aedaa5
> >>
> >> The last $ru value results from a Route header
> >>
> >> For information, Record-route of previous message (200OK) is
> composed
> >> with two record-route in the same field, comma separated.
> >> Is Opensips 1.6.4 able to interpret this type of Record-route ?
> >>
> >> Is loose_route function using Route headers of previous messages
> >> (200OK before ACK) to route this message ? Or is it using only
> actual
> >> message's Route headers ?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >> If you need further informations, feel free to ask us.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> *Kevin MATHY*
> >> *HEXANET*
> >> *
> >> --
> >> *
> >> Téléphone : 03.26.79.30.05
> >> Web : www.hexanet.fr <http://www.hexanet.fr>
> <http://www.hexanet.fr>
> >>
> >> Pour toute demande de support, merci de contacter le
> *03.51.08.42.07*,
> >> ou bien d'adresser un e-mail à *support at hexanet.fr
> <mailto:support at hexanet.fr>
> >> <mailto:support at hexanet.fr <mailto:support at hexanet.fr>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120831/6e19dfe5/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list