[OpenSIPS-Users] A Dynamic List of Gateways
Shaahin Madani
shaahin.madani at gmail.com
Thu Aug 30 16:09:45 CEST 2012
Hi Bogdan and Brett,
Thanks for your replies. The issue here is that my OpenSIPS simply does not
have the list of gateways, that is the gateways are *not* available in the
dr_gateways table. For every INVITE request, the list of gateways must be
dynamically built, and only afterwards the actual dynamic routing can take
place. The logic behind building the list of gateways relies on a totally
separate database.
To sum it up, I would say the desired scenario would resemble the steps
below:
1) OpenSIPS receives an INVITE
2) OpenSIPS asks an external system (e.g. the Perl script) for the gateways
available for this specific INVITE request
3) A list of gateways is returned to OpenSIPS (based on some black-box
logic)
4) OpenSIPS dynamically routes the INVITE to the specified gateways,
prioritising based on cost, time, or ...
I wonder whether in step (3) the list can actually be returned to OpenSIPS
for further processing in the script, or both steps (3) and (4) must be
implemented in the Perl script. Anyway, that is the desired scenario, which
must be changed according to the limitations. Any guidance would be much
appreciated.
Regards,
Shaahin
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Brett Nemeroff <brett at nemeroff.com> wrote:
> You haven't really said why the drouting module won't work. Why do you say
> the system won't know the gateway list itself? Where is this complicated
> business logic?
>
> Chances are between memcache and db queries you can do what you want. If
> you want to use drouting to store the gateway list, but not use the
> dr_rules logic, you can sort of do that as well, but you'll have to play
> tricks with what rules you use.
>
> Also if the gateway's IPs are changing and the dr_gateways/dr_carriers
> tables don't meet your needs, you could always use the attrs column or even
> the gw_id_avp/rule_id_avp/carrier_id_avp to simply look something else up
> and just ignore (read: rewrite on your own) the destination.
>
> I'm not sure how you are proposing to use your perl module. I wouldn't use
> the exec module for any realtime in call lookups *ever* (and I'm a big perl
> fan). The perl module is pretty cool, but I don't think it's maintained and
> you won't get the best performance from it I don't think (would love to
> hear other's opinions here).
>
> Maybe if you told us a little bit about your complicated business logic,
> we may be able to provide more guidance?
> -Brett
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Shaahin Madani <shaahin.madani at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> I understand that forwarding calls to a certain gateway can be achieved
>> using the rewritehostport(…) function; and that
>> prefix-/caller-/group-/time-/priority-based dynamic routing can be
>> addressed using the DROUTING module. However, in my system what actually
>> is “dynamic” is the gateway list itself, which is therefore not a subset of
>> the dr_gateways table. In fact, OpenSIPS has no idea about the list of
>> gateways due to the complex business-logic involved. The dynamic gateway
>> list, nevertheless, needs to be treated identical to an ordinary one, i.e.
>> prefix, time and priority of gateways must be considered.
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120831/61271a82/attachment.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list