[OpenSIPS-Users] [Re: Routing problem with Record-Route]

Hubert Mickael mickael at winlux.fr
Sat Aug 25 17:06:13 CEST 2012


Hi Binan,
yes I have the param in my opensips script.

Regards

Le 25/08/2012 13:25, Binan AL Halabi a écrit :
> Hi Mickael,
> Do you have this in you script:
> modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
>
> BR.
> //Binan
>
>
> --- On *Fri, 8/24/12, mickael at winlux.fr /<mickael at winlux.fr>/* wrote:
>
>
>     From: mickael at winlux.fr <mickael at winlux.fr>
>     Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [Re: Routing problem with Record-Route]
>     To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" <users at lists.opensips.org>
>     Date: Friday, August 24, 2012, 5:08 AM
>
>     Exactly Opensips add lr=on and callee device transform it into
>     lr;r2=on.
>
>     my other devices (asterisk, avaya, etc ...) do not transform lr...
>
>     My Opensips version is version: opensips 1.6.4-2-tls (i386/freebsd)
>
>     what is the difference between lr=on and lr;r2=on ?
>
>     > So OpenSIPS adds "lr=on" but the callee device transform it into a
>     > "lr".....
>     >
>     > What version of opensips are you using?
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     >
>     > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>     > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>     > http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>     >
>     >
>     > On 08/24/2012 02:27 PM, mickael at winlux.fr
>     </mc/compose?to=mickael at winlux.fr> wrote:
>     >> Hi Bogdan-Andrei,
>     >> Thank you for your response.
>     >>
>     >> Yes I confirm in INVITE I have 2 RR with lr=on:
>     >>
>     >>
>     <sip:8.8.8.8;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>     >>
>     <sip:8.8.8.9;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>     >>
>     >> and in 200OK I have 1 RR with just lr:
>     >>
>     >>
>     <sip:8.8.8.8;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>,<sip:8.8.8.9;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>     >>
>     >> and in ACK I have 2 Route with lr:
>     >>
>     >>
>     <sip:8.8.8.8;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>     >>
>     <sip:8.8.8.9;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>> Hi Mickael,
>     >>>
>     >>> Can you confirm (for the failed call) that OpenSIPS added in
>     INVITE RR
>     >>> hdrs with "lr=on" param and in the 200 OK or ACK you get only "lr"
>     >>> param
>     >>> (with no value) ?
>     >>>
>     >>> Regards,
>     >>>
>     >>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>     >>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>     >>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> On 08/24/2012 11:09 AM, mickael at winlux.fr
>     </mc/compose?to=mickael at winlux.fr> wrote:
>     >>>> Hi list,
>     >>>> I have a routing problem with my Opensips
>     >>>> version: opensips 1.6.4-2-tls (i386/freebsd)
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Indeed Opensips is unable to route ACK packet to final
>     destination
>     >>>> (look
>     >>>> attachement .txt).
>     >>>>
>     >>>> The only difference with a normal call (Call OK), it's
>     Record-Route
>     >>>> formating. Customer's device send 200OK with differents fields:
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Test device with the problem (call NOT OK):
>     >>>> Ex: problem call = 1 field for 2 routes
>     >>>> Extract from the customer 200OK
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Record-Route:
>     >>>>
>     <sip:8.8.8.8;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>,<sip:9.9.9.9;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Test with another device (call OK)
>     >>>> Ex: normal call = 2 fields for 2 routes
>     >>>> Extract from the Customer 200OK
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Record-Route:
>     >>>>
>     <sip:8.8.8.8;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>     >>>> Record-Route:
>     >>>>
>     <sip:9.9.9.9;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>     >>>>
>     >>>> My question is: This opensips version is able to work with 1
>     >>>> record-route
>     >>>> field containing 2 informations ?
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Thanks in advance
>     >>>>
>     >>>> regards
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>> _______________________________________________
>     >>>> Users mailing list
>     >>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>     </mc/compose?to=Users at lists.opensips.org>
>     >>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Users mailing list
>     >> Users at lists.opensips.org </mc/compose?to=Users at lists.opensips.org>
>     >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>     >>
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Users mailing list
>     > Users at lists.opensips.org </mc/compose?to=Users at lists.opensips.org>
>     > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>     >
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Users mailing list
>     Users at lists.opensips.org </mc/compose?to=Users at lists.opensips.org>
>     http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120825/54919216/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list