[OpenSIPS-Users] [Re: Routing problem with Record-Route]

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

So OpenSIPS adds "lr=on" but the callee device transform it into a "lr".....

What version of opensips are you using?

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 08/24/2012 02:27 PM, mickael at winlux.fr wrote:
> Hi Bogdan-Andrei,
> Thank you for your response.
>
> Yes I confirm in INVITE I have 2 RR with lr=on:
>
> <sip:8.8.8.8;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
> <sip:8.8.8.9;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>
> and in 200OK I have 1 RR with just lr:
>
> <sip:8.8.8.8;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>,<sip:8.8.8.9;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>
> and in ACK I have 2 Route with lr:
>
> <sip:8.8.8.8;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
> <sip:8.8.8.9;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>
>
>> Hi Mickael,
>>
>> Can you confirm (for the failed call) that OpenSIPS added in INVITE RR
>> hdrs with "lr=on" param and in the 200 OK or ACK you get only "lr" param
>> (with no value) ?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>>
>> On 08/24/2012 11:09 AM, mickael at winlux.fr wrote:
>>> Hi list,
>>> I have a routing problem with my Opensips
>>> version: opensips 1.6.4-2-tls (i386/freebsd)
>>>
>>> Indeed Opensips is unable to route ACK packet to final destination (look
>>> attachement .txt).
>>>
>>> The only difference with a normal call (Call OK), it's Record-Route
>>> formating. Customer's device send 200OK with differents fields:
>>>
>>>
>>> Test device with the problem (call NOT OK):
>>> Ex: problem call = 1 field for 2 routes
>>> Extract from the customer 200OK
>>>
>>> Record-Route:
>>> <sip:8.8.8.8;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>,<sip:9.9.9.9;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>>>
>>>
>>> Test with another device (call OK)
>>> Ex: normal call = 2 fields for 2 routes
>>> Extract from the Customer 200OK
>>>
>>> Record-Route:
>>> <sip:8.8.8.8;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>>> Record-Route:
>>> <sip:9.9.9.9;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>
>>>
>>> My question is: This opensips version is able to work with 1
>>> record-route
>>> field containing 2 informations ?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>