[OpenSIPS-Users] ICE How-To

Adrian Georgescu ag at ag-projects.com
Thu Jun 23 16:11:42 CEST 2011


For testing ICE you can use on Mac, Linux or Windows this command line client:

http://sipsimpleclient.com/wiki/sip_session

type /rtp and you can see the whole ICE negotiating results:

adi at umts.ro> /rtp
Output of RTP statistics and ICE negotiation results on console is now activated
adi at umts.ro> /audio ag at sip2sip.info
Initiating SIP session from 'sip:adi at umts.ro' to 'sip:ag at sip2sip.info' via sip:81.23.228.150:5060;transport=udp...
 
ICE negotiation succeeded in 0s:644
 
Local ICE candidates:
(RTP)	 95.97.50.27:55656        	 type srflx
(RTP)	 192.168.1.122:55656      	 type host
(RTP)	 10.211.55.2:55656        	 type host
(RTP)	 10.37.129.2:55656        	 type host
(RTCP)	 95.97.50.27:55890        	 type srflx
(RTCP)	 192.168.1.122:55890      	 type host
(RTCP)	 10.211.55.2:55890        	 type host
(RTCP)	 10.37.129.2:55890        	 type host
(RTP)	 81.23.228.150:51782      	 type prflx
(RTCP)	 81.23.228.150:51783      	 type prflx
 
Remote ICE candidates:
(RTP)	 81.23.228.150:51780      	 type relay
(RTCP)	 81.23.228.150:51781      	 type relay
(RTP)	 95.97.50.27:55876        	 type srflx
(RTP)	 192.168.1.122:55876      	 type host
(RTP)	 10.211.55.2:55876        	 type host
(RTP)	 10.37.129.2:55876        	 type host
(RTCP)	 95.97.50.27:54037        	 type srflx
(RTCP)	 192.168.1.122:54037      	 type host
(RTCP)	 10.211.55.2:54037        	 type host
(RTCP)	 10.37.129.2:54037        	 type host
 
ICE connectivity check results:
(RTP)	 192.168.1.122:55656 <--> 192.168.1.122:55876 	Succeeded
(RTP)	 10.211.55.2:55656 <--> 10.211.55.2:55876 	Succeeded
(RTP)	 10.37.129.2:55656 <--> 10.37.129.2:55876 	Succeeded
(RTCP)	 192.168.1.122:55890 <--> 192.168.1.122:54037 	Succeeded
(RTCP)	 10.211.55.2:55890 <--> 10.211.55.2:54037 	Succeeded
(RTCP)	 10.37.129.2:55890 <--> 10.37.129.2:54037 	Succeeded
(RTP)	 95.97.50.27:55656 <--> 95.97.50.27:55876 	Succeeded
(RTCP)	 95.97.50.27:55890 <--> 95.97.50.27:54037 	Succeeded
(RTP)	 81.23.228.150:51782 <--> 81.23.228.150:51780 	Succeeded
(RTCP)	 81.23.228.150:51783 <--> 81.23.228.150:51781 	Succeeded
 
Audio session established using "G722" codec at 16000Hz
Audio RTP endpoints 192.168.1.122:55656 (ICE type host) <-> 192.168.1.122:55876 (ICE type host)

On Jun 23, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Barsan Liviu wrote:

> Hi Saul,
> 
> I mean by 'the rest' that I don't have to write code in the opensips.cfg to have ICE ( e.g. see which kind of NAT it is etc.), just to set the parameters for the mediaproxy as written below.
> I think I understood from your answer what I have to do.
> 
> In the same time I'm thinking how to test ICE, do you think a proper way is to make two tests:
> 1. Two clients behind a router that does not have symmetric nat (e.g. conic nat) and server with public IP, in this case the media stream should follow the STUN way (not via relay).
> 2. Two clients behind a router with symmetric nat, in this case media stream should go via relay (mediaproxy).
> Obviously we should have clients with ICE support, we use Bria 3.2, 2.5.4 or Blink.
> 
> And to follow the media streams I have to install CDRTool and FreeRadius server.
> Do you think this scenario is suitable to prove the ICE capability of the server?
> 
> Thanks,
> Liviu
> 
> From: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul at ag-projects.com>
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
> Sent: Thu, June 23, 2011 10:20:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] ICE How-To
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Jun 22, 2011, at 5:35 PM, Barsan Liviu wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > We have built until now an OpenSIPs-MediaProxy server which knows far end NAT traversal, Messaging and Presence (basic), it works reliable.
> > Now we would like to add ICE capability to this solution and we are not sure on How-To. According to http://mediaproxy-ng.org/wiki/ICE, we understood that is enough to set the mediaproxy modules parameters as written in the site, something like:
> > 
> > ice_candidate="high-priority"
> > ice_candidate_avp="$avp(s:ice_priority)"
> > 
> 
> The AVP is meant to be used for fine grained control, the ice_candidate module parameter should be enough in most cases.
> 
> > It is enough to have these settings?
> > The rest will be done by MediaProxy and OpenSIPs automatically?
> > 
> 
> What do you mean by 'the rest' ? If you client is offering ICE and OpenSIPS/MediaProxy are mangling the signaling, that setting will make MediaProxy modify the SDP in such a way that ICE is not broken.
> 
> If you want to really test ICE you'll want to set the ice_candidate parameter to low-priority, otherwise chances are MediaPRoxy will always be used.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
> AG Projects
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110623/5c38e2b5/attachment.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list