[OpenSIPS-Users] Q Value not acting right after Serialize_branches

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Duane,

your logs do not cover the most important part - the first 
"next_branches"... Could you repost ?

Regards,
Bogdan

On 07/15/2011 03:43 AM, Duane Larson wrote:
> I have a scenario where there are three numbers that need to be called
> 90127X2XX9 should get called first        || Q-value is 90
> 90148X7XX9 should get called second   || Q-value is 50
> 90133X9XX9 should get called last        || Q-Value is 40
> The issue i am seeing is that the first and second number are getting 
> called in parrallel and then the third number gets called last.  I 
> have debug the issue with level 6.  I'm not able to paste the debug to 
> pastebin because it is too big.  So here is a a shortened version.  
> Hopefully the relevant stuff
> http://pastebin.com/D8NK50X9
> Just for something to compare I have the second scenario where the Q 
> Value works properly without issue
> 90127X2XX9 gets called first         || Q-Value is 90
> 90133X9XX9 gets called second    || Q-Value is 70
> 90148X7XX9 gets called last         || Q-Value is 50
> With this each call is called serially in the order that they should.
> I also have a debug for this but I also can't paste this to pastebin.
> Here is the relevant stuff
>
> http://pastebin.com/vRiLiRw9
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


-- 
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 19th of September 2011
OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110809/2de7742e/attachment.htm>