[OpenSIPS-Users] topology_hiding Record-Route
bogdan at opensips.org
Mon Aug 8 21:35:19 CEST 2011
My first guess is that the 180 somehow does no match the
transaction....If you can reproduce the case, could you run a call with
debug=6 and post the opensips log ?
On 08/08/2011 08:24 AM, Pavel Eremin wrote:
> iF i use topology_hiding in initial request then initial 'INVITE' are
> good. There are no Record-Route or Via(except myself) header exist.
> But in
> 180 and 183 SIP messages Record-Route is present.
> Topology_hiding must delete RR header 180 and 183 in messages too,
> Does it?
> Some scheme like sip_trace. I need to hide C sip-proxy. B is
> topology_hiding opensips. A - some client.
> A -> initial -> B
> C <- initial <- B
> B -> 100 try -> A
> C -> 180 Ring -> B
> A <- 180 Ring <- B (RR present with C ip) ???
> C -> 200 OK -> B
> A <- 200 OK <- B (no RR present)
> ... ACK Exchange and Buy
OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 19th of September 2011
OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"
More information about the Users