[OpenSIPS-Users] SIP Presence Aggregation Issue
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Thu May 27 16:45:03 CEST 2010
But nobody forces you put an email address as contact into the tuple.
Just take the good ideas and ignore the bad ideas.
regards
Klaus
Am 26.05.2010 19:55, schrieb Iñaki Baz Castillo:
> 2010/5/26 Klaus Darilion<klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>:
>> Am 26.05.2010 10:33, schrieb Iñaki Baz Castillo:
>>>
>>> Also remember: according to IETF's SIMPLE group brains, if you have a
>>> working e-mail address (can receive mails) then your SIP presentity
>>> should display you as "available via mail" (WTF ?!?!?).
>>
>> How should it display this? As a<note> with status "closed"?
>
> Yes, but IETF suggests that your UA should publish a<tuple> with
> <contact>mailto:yourmail at domain.org</contact> and<basic>open</basic>.
>
> Imagine I'm at home but my phone is in DND and "offline" status.
> Anyone could come to my home and call me (using the human voice).
> Should my SIP device publish that "I'm available by human voice at
> home" (<basic>open</basic>) ?
>
> It seems that IETF SIMPLE group claims that SIMPLE presence should
> cover *any* presence status. This makes most usual cases unclear and
> complex.
> IMHO a user could publish "I'm available on mail" and also provide an
> email account, but it shouldn't mean a "open" status at all as this is
> SIP, no SMTP/POP.
>
> When a specification tries to cover all the world and dominate all the
> rest, it becomes... COMPLEX.
>
>
More information about the Users
mailing list