[OpenSIPS-Users] SIP Presence Aggregation Issue

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Thu May 20 18:48:02 CEST 2010


Hi Adrian!

I just tested with A1 communicator (a branded Bria) and A1oIP service 
(unfortunately I do not know the vendor of the presence server).

Scenario:

A1 >---PUBLISH--\
                 Presence Server>--NOTIFY--> B
A2 >---PUBLISH--/


A1 is available, A2 is "offline":

XML document sent to B:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" 
xmlns:ci="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" 
xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model" 
xmlns:lt="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type" 
xmlns:r="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid" entity="sip:foobar at a1.net">
<tuple id="tc66deb3a">
	<status>
		<basic>closed</basic>
	</status>
	<timestamp>2010-05-20T15:29:05Z</timestamp>
</tuple>

<tuple id="t096a4143">
	<status>
		<basic>open</basic>
	</status>
	<timestamp>2010-05-20T15:22:51Z</timestamp>
</tuple>
<dm:person id="p751bb06a">
	<dm:note>Offline</dm:note>
	<dm:timestamp>2010-05-20T15:29:05Z</dm:timestamp>
</dm:person>

<dm:person id="p2a1d2439">
	<r:activities>
		<r:busy/>
	</r:activities>
	<dm:note>Busy</dm:note>
	<dm:timestamp>2010-05-20T15:22:51Z</dm:timestamp>
</dm:person>
</presence>



Rendering of the 2 tuples by A1 communicator: see screenshot
The icon is green (available), but the word "offline" is added.


regards
Klaus


Am 11.05.2010 17:48, schrieb Adrian Georgescu:
> I could not figure out any differences in signaling or XCAP between latest Bria and previous Eyebeam.
>
> They seem to be the same software with a different skin.
>
> Adrian
>
> On May 11, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
>> Anca, I recently found out that there is a beta of X-Lite 4.0 which
>> looks like as it is based on Bria. I have not tested it, but you may
>> want to give it a try.
>> http://www.counterpath.com/x-lite-download.html
>>
>> regards
>> Klaus
>>
>> Am 11.05.2010 11:20, schrieb Anca Vamanu:
>>> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>>> Am 01.04.2010 16:30, schrieb Adrian Georgescu:
>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 1, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Schumann Sebastian wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Bogdan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, in an "ideal world", this re-publishing with BUSY and ONLINE is
>>>>>> wanted, but the toggling not. Priorities would help (you'd receive
>>>>>> that but not trigger anything on the user interface as the highest
>>>>>> priority will keep its state), but we don't have them yet, so in
>>>>>> that case the decision must be made somewhere else or not at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> All we need is a good client to figure out how to use these concepts,
>>>>> right?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regarding clients:
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK Microsoft's Communicator SUBSCRIBEs its own presence and as soon
>>>> as you manually set the status on one of your clients, all other clients
>>>> will change its state too.
>>>>
>>>> And there is the A1 Communicator (a branded Bria softphone) which
>>>> displays an aggregated state, e.g. if a buddy is online with 2 clients,
>>>> one sending "online", one sending "offline", you will see something like
>>>> "online (offline)" on the buddy list.
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>> klaus
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hi Klaus,
>>>
>>> Bria - CounterPath? It's a very good piece of information and if so I
>>> could test this while at SIPIT as counterpath is bringing bria there.
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: a1communicator-online-offline2.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 30960 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100520/6df9fd57/attachment-0001.gif 


More information about the Users mailing list