[OpenSIPS-Users] [RFC] What repo to use for 2.0 ?

[Saúl Ibarra Corretgé]

Hi,

El 02/03/10 19:18, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu escribió:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As we are getting closed to first working code for OpenSIPS 2.0 (a proto
> core including config, transport, threading, reactor and dispatcher), we
> will upload the code the public SF repo.
>
> I would like to get some feedback from you about what repo type to use -
> as we have the opportunity to start a fresh new piece of code, we have
> the option to use a different repo than SVN.
>
> SF offers the following options
>      - SVN
>      - git
>      - mercurial
>      - bazaar
>
> Should we keep SVN ? pros ? minuses ? something much better ?
>

I'm glad you brought this question up :)

I think it would be important to switch to a distributed version control 
system, so I'd leave svn out. Being able to do local commints and keep 
you own branch in sync with trunk before merging changes is much more 
easier than with a centralized one. :)

Personally I'm not very familiar with mercurial or bazaar, but Git is 
quite well known for being able to integrate with other non distributed 
VCS as svn.

That said, I'd go for Git, but having a svn mirror would also be nice so 
that people can still fetch the source the 'old skool' way.
>
> PS: should we create a poll on the project web site ?
>

That would be nice too.


Best regards,


-- 
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
AG Projects