[OpenSIPS-Users] B2BUA help
Anca Vamanu
anca at opensips.org
Tue Feb 9 10:43:22 CET 2010
Hi Marie,
Can you please investigate the core with gdb?
Regards,
--
Anca Vamanu
www.voice-system.ro
marie.gremillot wrote:
>
> Hello every body,
>
> I have installed opensips and b2bua and I often have these errors
> (followed by the crash of the server) :
>
> segfault at 646e657b ip 080de8dc sp bfbcceb0 error 6 in
> opensips[8048000+10f000]
> CRITICAL:core:receive_fd: EOF on 15
>
>
> It appears at different moments : when I connect, when I call, when
> the server is up too many time...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Message du 08/02/10 18:43
> > De : "Anca Vamanu"
> > A : "OpenSIPS users mailling list"
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] B2BUA help
> >
> >
> > opensipslist at encambio.com wrote:
> > > Hello Anca,
> > >
> > > An lun., févr 08, 2010, Anca VAMANU schrieb:
> > >
> > >> The scenario that you want - authorizing the user at the media
> > >> server in a bridging scenario will not work. You can not call
> > >> b2b_init twice for the same dialog. The B2B implementation
> does not
> > >> include the authorization requirements. And in fact I believe
> that
> > >> you are complicating things by wanting the user to authorize
> to the
> > >> media server. The normal approach will be for the user to
> authorize
> > >> to the proxy and only after it has been authorize to call
> b2b_init
> > >> function. And for the media server not to ask for authorization
> > >> because the proxy should be in a trusted source list and the
> > >> requests coming from it should not be challenged.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Okay now it's clear, thanks for the help. But the problem is not
> > > solved, because there are situations in which the INVITE from your
> > > B2B logic should be challenged. In my case, the media server is
> > > serving voicemail as well. It must challenge incoming INVITEs
> > > because sometimes the 'From' URI describes a voicemail user that
> > > will be authorized to listen to their messages by way of the
> > > standard WWW-Authenticate.
> > >
> > > At the same time, I'm sure there's no problem in passing the
> > > 'Authorization' header if I make a new B2B module or simply patch
> > > the existing one. Is it true that calling b2b_init a second time
> > > will be no problem, because as b2b_logic sees the 401
> > > WWW-AUthenticate it will close the dialog started by the INVITE?
> > >
> > > Can you please advise me whether the needed change to pass the
> > > 'Authorization' header is in b2b_entities or b2b_logic? Do you
> > > see any problem in doing this?
> > >
> > > I have some other ideas of implementing B2B modules ontop of
> > > b2b_entities, so this would be a good way to become introduced
> > > to the code.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Brian
> > >
> > Yes, the authorization header should pass no matter what. I will
> try
> > this myself and check if there is a bug.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Anca Vamanu
> > www.voice-system.ro
> >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users at lists.opensips.org
> > > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at lists.opensips.org
> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Pieddemail
> <https://compte.laposte.net/inscription/index.do?jeux=201001FOOTER>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
More information about the Users
mailing list