No subject

is better, I already posted crashing rate for our use case.
I haven't experienced any stabilty issues with * 1.6 yet, but it only s=
ees light traffic.=20
FS is a great piece of software but it does have issues, sometimes even=
 simplest things like "find me" function work flawlessly in * and pain =
in the ass to impelement in fs due to either bad nat handling or some o=
ther bugs.


-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Dekkers
Sent:  12/10/2010 3:28:11 AM
To: 'paul.gore.j at gmail.com'; 'OpenSIPS users
 mailling list'
Subject:  RE: [OpenSIPS-Users] Freeswitch vs Asterisk

The reason people are yelling on the internet "Freeswitch is much bette=
r than asterisk" is pure frustration.=20
They have used asterisk for years, were faced with crashes and since th=
ey are using freeswitch they don't see those crashes anymore (apart fro=
m the reason of those crashes).
No wonder they tell everyone freeswitch is better than asterisk. From t=
heir point of view asterisk is bad.

It's not Mr. Collins opinion that asterisk is worse than freeswitch. It=
 are the ex-asterisk people who are saying that, think about that.

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: users-bounces at lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-bounces at lists.opens=
ips.org] Namens paul.gore.j at gmail.com
Verzonden: donderdag 9 december 2010 16:27
Aan: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Onderwerp: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Freeswitch vs Asterisk

I just want to reply to mr Collins with FS: your post looks very much l=
ike advertisement, and I have seen that "fs is so much better than *" a=
ll over internet from people connected to fs. That is unethical to say =
the least.=20
In fact we have exprerienced fs crashes with core dump at least  once i=
n 6 months and we process just under 40K calls/month.=20
As to "nat tools" which you mentioned they just do not work. In fact us=
ually * box works much better for natted users.
As to xml curl interface - we do use it, and it's a pathetic way to fee=
d a dialplan to a switch, since it's inefficient resource wise, but the=
re was no other way available for real time solution where's * supports=
 real time db out of the box.=20
Trust me we do have development experience with both * socket interface=
 and fs one, and in my opinion * solution is far better and has far les=
s bugs.

-----Original Message-----
From: James Mbuthia
Sent:  12/08/2010 5:55:42 PM
Subject:  Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Freeswitch vs Asterisk