[OpenSIPS-Users] Freeswitch vs Asterisk

[paul.gore.j at gmail.com]

We use freeswitch in prod alone, no opensips yet. I would say fs is definetly more scalable than *. 
Stability wise seems like fs is on par with *.
* has substantially better interface for control over socket connection - it's easier to implement and it's more consistent.
Configuration wise, I think * is easier, xml- based approach in fs is cumbersome and has no real advantage over *. 
We have endless problems with fs nat handling, lots of no audio issues with end users behind a nat. That's why we want to try opensips solution for that.


-----Original Message-----
From: James Mbuthia
Sent:  12/07/2010 8:54:51 AM
Subject:  [OpenSIPS-Users] Freeswitch vs Asterisk

Hi guys,

I want to integrate my Opensips implementation with either Asterisk or
Freeswitch to do the following functions

- Act as a Media server
- Connect to the PSTN
- Act as a B2BUA


There's been alot of hype about Freeswitch and I wanted to know from people
who've integrated it to OpenSIPS how it compares to Asterisk especially in
the case of installation and intergration, scalability and ease of
maintenance.  Any info would be a huge help

regards,
james

:::0:a0e8dc7ff9acb0ae85abefba43f14c73:-1:x:::