[OpenSIPS-Users] Shared 'location' table?

[Laszlo]

2010/4/22 Chris Maciejewski <chris at wima.co.uk>

> Hi,
>
> I made a diagram showing what I am trying to achieve:
>
> http://wima.co.uk/2x_opensips.pdf
>
> Is this possible at all?
> Can we make two OpenSIPs share the same 'location' table, yet each
> dealing only with it's "own" contacts?
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
>
> On 22 April 2010 18:47, Brett Nemeroff <brett at nemeroff.com> wrote:
> > Just a quick question here.. can some of this be taken care of with a
> > t_replicate for the register?
> >
> > Just a thought..
> > -Brett
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Chris Maciejewski <chris at wima.co.uk>
> wrote:
> >> On 22 April 2010 18:11, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro>
> wrote:
> >>> Chris Maciejewski wrote:
> >>>> On 22 April 2010 18:00, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Chris,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> running 2 opensips with different IPs ? because opensips saves in
> >>>>> location table its own socket (where the REGISTER was received), and
> if
> >>>>> the other server will try to use it, it will not recognize this
> socket
> >>>>> (as it is a different IP).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Before going further, note that multiple opensips  sharing  the same
> >>>>> location table has some flows (due how SIP works) - like if you are
> >>>>> using multiple interfaces, of different port ; also NAT traversal
> will
> >>>>> not work.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In the end, if you do not have NAT and using a single interface, you
> can
> >>>>> simply ignore those warnings.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Bogdan
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Bogdan,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for clarification. I am aware due to NAT traversal etc.
> >>>> multiple SIP registrar servers sharing the same location table will
> >>>> not work.
> >>>>
> >>>> I was just worried this WARNINGs might have some negative impact, but
> >>>> in that case I will just ignore them.
> >>>>
> >>> If opensips finds a non-local socket in a usrloc records, it will fire
> >>> the warning and use one of its own sockets for dealing with that
> contact.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Bogdan
> >>>
> >>
> >> Ah, I see now.
> >>
> >> When UA1 registered at Proxy1 only, Nathelper OPTIONs are sent from
> >> both Proxy1 and Proxy2. This is not what I wanted :(
> >>
> >> Is there any way to make Proxy2 completely ignore UA1?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Chris
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>

http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/2008-November/001729.html

It can be a starting point.

-Laszlo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100422/ecdf6abd/attachment.htm