[OpenSIPS-Users] Shared 'location' table?

[Chris Maciejewski]

On 22 April 2010 18:11, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
> Chris Maciejewski wrote:
>> On 22 April 2010 18:00, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> running 2 opensips with different IPs ? because opensips saves in
>>> location table its own socket (where the REGISTER was received), and if
>>> the other server will try to use it, it will not recognize this socket
>>> (as it is a different IP).
>>>
>>> Before going further, note that multiple opensips  sharing  the same
>>> location table has some flows (due how SIP works) - like if you are
>>> using multiple interfaces, of different port ; also NAT traversal will
>>> not work.
>>>
>>> In the end, if you do not have NAT and using a single interface, you can
>>> simply ignore those warnings.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bogdan
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi Bogdan,
>>
>> Thanks for clarification. I am aware due to NAT traversal etc.
>> multiple SIP registrar servers sharing the same location table will
>> not work.
>>
>> I was just worried this WARNINGs might have some negative impact, but
>> in that case I will just ignore them.
>>
> If opensips finds a non-local socket in a usrloc records, it will fire
> the warning and use one of its own sockets for dealing with that contact.
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>

Ah, I see now.

When UA1 registered at Proxy1 only, Nathelper OPTIONs are sent from
both Proxy1 and Proxy2. This is not what I wanted :(

Is there any way to make Proxy2 completely ignore UA1?

Regards,
Chris