[OpenSIPS-Users] Comparing client_nat_test with nat_uac_test

[Thomas Gelf]

Sorry for double-posting, the former variant was the right one.

Thomas Gelf schrieb:
> Another thing I stumbled over is one missing test in client_nat_test():
> test 1 is the same in both modules, nat_traversal's test 2 corresponds
> to 18 (2 & 16) in nathelper's nat_uac_test, test 8 (search RFC1918
> addresses in the SDP payload) has no equivalent in client_nat_test().
> 
> Is test 8 useless? Is anyone aware of scenarios where RFC1918 could
> appear in SDP, even with a correct SIP header? I know that EVERYTHING is
> possible with a braindead ALG - but are there other situations where
> this could happen? I wasn't able to figure out such an example, so
> client_nat_test("7") should probably suffice.
> 
> Best regards,
> Thomas Gelf