[OpenSIPS-Users] error in config file - invalid routing table number

[Norman Brandinger]

I have some (very) large config files.  At some point increasing the 
following variable helped (also in config.h):

#define PKG_MEM_POOL_SIZE 4*1024*1024

To answer your previous question, no, the route table numbers do not 
have to be sequential.

Regards,
Norm

Patrick wrote:
> Would having more than 100 route tables mean I might run into issues 
> with private memory?  The is no command argument to change that 
> (unlike shared mem)...
>
>
> On May 19, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Norman Brandinger wrote:
>
> Take a look at config.h, specifically the following setting:
>
> #define RT_NO 100
>
> You'll have to recompile after changing the value.
>
> Regards,
> Norm
>
> Patrick wrote:
>> Hello,
>>     I've run into a limitation in the config file.   I'm defining  
>> routes tables as
>>
>> route[1] {
>>    ...
>> }
>>
>> ....
>>
>> route[100] {
>>    ...
>> }
>>
>>
>> opensips: CRITICAL:core:yyerror: parse error in config file, line  
>> 2000, column 1-2: invalid routing table number
>>
>>
>> Is there a limit of only 1-99 for routing tables?   Also, do these  
>> numbers have to be sequential?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
>
>