[OpenSIPS-Users] Issues with ACK with 2 NIC opensips + GW behind NAT

[oso che bol]

Hi IBC,

Do you mean function record_route_preset() ?

Thanks,
-LN

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc at aliax.net> wrote:

> 2009/5/4 oso che bol <ndlgroup1 at gmail.com>:
> > Dear IBC,
> >
> > with the bug "No Route" in 200 sent by GW, there are any workaround on
> > opensips to fix that? We could force ACK go through opensips?
>
> A really *dirty* workaround would be:
>
> In onreply_route[] for replies from GW, add the "Route" header to the
> 200 Ok (look for a funtion which does it in "tm" module).
>
> But this is really dirty.
>
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc at aliax.net>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090505/4db811ef/attachment-0001.htm