[OpenSIPS-Users] serialize_branches/next_branches problem

[Jeff Pyle]

Bogdan,

I'm seeing the same behavior in 1.4.5.  There's got to be some misconfig on
my part, no?


- Jeff



On 3/30/09 3:02 PM, "Jeff Pyle" <jpyle at fidelityvoice.com> wrote:

> Hi Bogdan,
> 
> Here it is:
> 
> Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: resume
> branch=0 
> Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: checking
> branch=0 (added=0)
> Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: branch=0 is a
> redirect (added=0)
> Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=7
> Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:core:get_hdr_field: content_length=0
> Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:core:get_hdr_field: found end of header
> Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:uac_redirect:sort_contacts:
> sort_contacts: <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.119.46:5060;user=phone> q=250
> Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:uac_redirect:sort_contacts:
> sort_contacts: <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone> q=500
> Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:uac_redirect:shmcontact2dset: adding
> contact <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.119.46:5060;user=phone>
> Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:uac_redirect:shmcontact2dset: adding
> contact <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone>
> Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:core:serialize_branches: loaded
> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.119.46:5060;user=phone>, q=250 q_flag <0>
> Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:core:serialize_branches: loaded
> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone>, q=500 q_flag <16>
> Mar 30 14:55:58 opensips[16337]: DBG:core:next_branches: branch is
> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone>
> 
> When t_relay¹ing this, parallel invites went out to both the .119.46 and
> .116.46 hosts.  Same as before.  Same 302 Contact header as well.
> 
> Shortly I¹m going to be reverting to 1.4.5 from 1.5.0 because 1.5.0 just
> ³stops² after many hours of use with no debug info and no core.  I have no
> idea why, and my attempts to get debug information have failed.  Unfortunately
> it¹s my only option.  As such, I won¹t be able to test this anymore on 1.5.
> 
> 
> - Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/30/09 5:12 AM, "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Jeff,
>> 
>> could you post the debug again? maybe there is something else....
>> 
>> Thanks and regards,
>> Bogdan
>> 
>> Jeff Pyle wrote:
>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>> 
>>> I still get the parallel forking to both contacts.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> - Jeff
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 3/26/09 2:48 PM, "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>>> 
>>>   
>>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>> 
>>>> I found a small bug in the uac_redirect() function - I fixed it on 1.5
>>>> and trunk, so if you upload from svn it should work now.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>> Bogdan
>>>> 
>>>> Jeff Pyle wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Debug level was 6 for get_redirects("*"), serialize_branches(1) and
>>>>> next_branches(). The contact header from the 302 was as follows:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
Contact:<sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone>;q=0.5,<sip:+130300>>>>>
0
>>>>> 00
>>>>> 00 at ww.xx.119.46:5060;user=phone>;q=0.25
>>>>> 
>>>>> Debug output:
>>>>> 
>>>>> DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: resume branch=0
>>>>> DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: checking branch=0 (added=0)
>>>>> DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: branch=0 is a redirect (added=0)
>>>>> DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=7
>>>>> DBG:core:get_hdr_field: content_length=0
>>>>> DBG:core:get_hdr_field: found end of header
>>>>> DBG:uac_redirect:sort_contacts: sort_contacts:
>>>>> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.119.46:5060;user=phone> q=250
>>>>> DBG:uac_redirect:sort_contacts: sort_contacts:
>>>>> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone> q=500
>>>>> DBG:uac_redirect:shmcontact2dset: adding contact
>>>>> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.119.46:5060;user=phone>
>>>>> DBG:uac_redirect:shmcontact2dset: adding contact
>>>>> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone>
>>>>> DBG:core:serialize_branches: loaded
>>>>> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.119.46:5060;user=phone>, q=-1 q_flag <0>
>>>>> DBG:core:serialize_branches: loaded
>>>>> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone>, q=500 q_flag <16>
>>>>> DBG:core:next_branches: branch is
>>>>> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone>
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Opensips build is from an SVN checkout of branches/1.5 about 15:00
>>>>> GMT today.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Jeff
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 3/23/09 10:38 AM, "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>       
>>>>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> please post the debug=6 logs - also be sure you are using the latest
>>>>>> version as a similar bug was fixed one or two weeks ago.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Bogdan
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jeff Pyle wrote:
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I catch a 302 in a failure_route that runs: get_redirects(³*²),
>>>>>>> serialize_branches and next_branches. The subsequent t_relay() causes
>>>>>>> a parallel fork to both contacts in the 302¹s Contact header.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The 302¹s Contact header looks like this:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>           
>>>>> 
Contact:<sip:+13030000000 at qq.rr.ss.tt:5060;user=phone>;q=0.5,<sip:+1303000>>>>>
0
>>>>> 00
>>>>>       
>>>>>>> 0 at qq.rr.ww.tt:5060;user=phone>;q=0.25
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I would expect it to load only the q=0.5 route at first, no?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Jeff
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>           
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users