[OpenSIPS-Users] 3.00 load avg

[Romanov Vladimir]

Hi!
Why you don't want use VM in production? We have plans to use Citrix XenServer. We use rptpproxy instead of mediaproxy.

-----------------
Vladimir Romanov
Scartel Star Lab
CTO
+7 (960) 239-0853


-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-bounces at lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Pyle
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 9:12 PM
To: Dan Pascu
Cc: users at lists.opensips.org
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] 3.00 load avg

Hi Dan,

I haven't tried it on a real box yet.  With all the things it hooks into
it's not exactly portable at the moment.  Nothing has changed elsewhere on
the system, either with the emulator, kernels on host or guest, etc.

I'm not *too* worried about it only because the apps on the system (vm) seem
to be running well.  I may drop the v-cpus from 4 to 2 to see if that
adversely affects performance under low load.

For what it's worth I've excellent success with Xen under CentOS with
Openser 1.3.2 and other apps.  The reports seem to be accurate everywhere
but here.  Even mediaproxy (under moderate to low load) does fairly well,
although I'd never consider going into production with it on a virtual
machine.

Thanks for the analysis.


- Jeff



On 3/16/09 1:38 PM, "Dan Pascu" <dan at ag-projects.com> wrote:
 
> There appear to be no network queue, so the app is idle. However you
> mention that you run this in a virtual machine. Do you see the problem
> with a real system as well? Otherwise I wouldn't rely on the accuracy of
> what the virtual machine reports. Besides, did you upgrade the emulator
> as well around that time? This may be very well a bug in the emulation
> software, reporting false status under certain conditions.



_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users