[OpenSIPS-Users] Ways of manipulating the From header of CANCEL

Ricardo Martins rpoppi77 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 23 14:00:48 CEST 2009


Hi Bogdan, I tried with both "manual" and "auto". At the time this log 
was generated, I didn't set this parameter, assuming the "auto" as default.

Rgrds, Ricardo.



Bogdan-Andrei Iancu escreveu:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> What from_restore_mode are you using ?
>    http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.5.x/uac.html#id227233
>
> Because indeed, the CANCEL is still using the old FROM:
>
> Jun 21 02:32:51 [3171] DBG:tm:build_local: using FROM=<From: "tronco2" 
> <sip:tronco2 at pabx1>;tag=as13631b36>, TO=<To: 
> <sip:556139659184 at pabx1:5090>>, CSEQ_N=<CSeq: 102>
> Jun 21 02:32:51 [3171] DBG:tm:cancel_branch: sending cancel...
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
> Ricardo Martins wrote:
>> Hi Bogdan! There is attached a log with debug 6 of the call. There 
>> you can see the opensips using the original from to build the cancel 
>> message before transmiting to the provider. And lots of 
>> retransmissions without a response from the provider.
>>
>> The environment is quite simple: The opensips is running on a machine 
>> with  two network interfaces. It receives the INVITE by the private 
>> network interface (192.168.200.246) and send it to a ppp0 interface 
>> with a fixed and public ip.
>>
>> For privacy reasons, I made the replacement of the public ip that 
>> appears on log and trace, using xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx instead. The original 
>> user at domain of the call is tronco2 at pabx1 and, after replacement, 
>> 617056557 at nheen.net.br.
>>
>> Thanks for your help. I think that there is something  tricky on my 
>> environment that is making this cancel to skip working "automagicaly".
>>
>> Regards! Ricardo.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu escreveu:
>>> Hi Ricardo,
>>>
>>>
>>> Ricardo Martins wrote:
>>>> Guys, I've been reading a lot on the list and testing on our 
>>>> servers (opensips 1.5) for some time but I still have a big issue!
>>>>
>>>> 1) If I use uac_replace_from on REQUEST route, the from header got 
>>>> miswritten (truncates) when using it twice. Bad for me, when 
>>>> intended to use it to provide backup routes on a call failure. But...
>>>>   
>>> yes, because the function can be called only once per branch - the 
>>> correct approach is the 2)
>>>> 2) When I use uac_replace_from on BRANCH route, the replacement 
>>>> works realy fine. In order to use a backup provider, I just arm the 
>>>> branch_route and, on branch route, execute uac_replace_from with 
>>>> the proper username/domain for that specific provider. The result 
>>>> is ok. The from header is properly rewriten, many times I need at 
>>>> the same transaction. But...
>>>>   
>>> so, no problems here, right ?
>>>> 3) When opensips receives a CANCEL, it do not rewrite the from 
>>>> header, prior to send it to the provider. Neither using the 
>>>> uac_replace_from function, neither using subst function (from 
>>>> textops). I read that CANCEL is locally generated, and that's why 
>>>> those funcions do not affect it. I read too that the 
>>>> uac_replace_from used on INVITE was expected to work on CANCELs 
>>>> automaticaly. But apears to not work when using uac_replace_from on 
>>>> BRANCH routes. And I tryied it with from_restore_mode parameter on 
>>>> 'manual' and on 'auto' mode.
>>>>   
>>> indeed, the CANCEL is internally generated, so whatever changes you 
>>> do for the received CANCEL in script are useless. But TM does 
>>> automagically update the FROM hdr in CANCELS (if the INVITE FROM was 
>>> changes), in any mode... If this does not happen, please post traces 
>>> and debug=6 logs for the call.
>>>
>>>> 4) Thats why I got a big of an issue! I MUST use the 
>>>> uac_replace_from on BRANCH routes to work with backup providers. 
>>>> And I MUST replace the from hdr of CANCEL, as my providers are 
>>>> rejecting CANCELs with diferent from headers!
>>>>   
>>> you do not have to deal with the CANCELs - they automatically done.. 
>>> see 3)
>>>> Do anybody could put this kind of environment to work? Have any 
>>>> clue about it?
>>>>   
>>>
>>> see 3), about traces and logs..
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bogdan
>>>> Regards!
>>>>
>>>> Ricardo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>




More information about the Users mailing list