[OpenSIPS-Users] [OpenXCAP] Is RFC 4745 implemented?

[Anca Vamanu]

Hi Inaki,

Yes, the specifications in RFC 4745 are for the presence server. And 
opensips presence server implements this rfc. It is also mentioned in 
the readme document for presence_xml module: 
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/presence_xml.html#id227122

regards,
Anca

Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2009/6/16 Luci Stanescu <luci at ag-projects.com>:
>   
>> Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>
>> Hi Iñaki,
>>
>>     
>>> Hi, does OpenXCAP implement RFC 4745 (Common Policy: A Document Format
>>> for Expressing Privacy Preferences)?
>>> I understand that this feature would be implemented by the XCAP server
>>> itself, am I right?
>>>       
>> OpenXCAP supports RFC5025 (Presence Authorization Rules) which is an
>> extension to RFC4745. RFC4745 does not define an XCAP application, but
>> rather a framework for defining authorization rules. So I do not really
>> understand what exactly you mean by a RFC4745 implementation in an XCAP
>> server. On another note, an XCAP server is responsible for storing XML
>> documents, it's the role of another entity (for example, the presence
>> agent in the case of pres-rules) to interprete them and act accordingly.
>>     
>
> You are completely right, thanks. I didn't understand the purpose of
> RFC 4745 by reading some lines of it.
> So, the presence agent (which could be OpenSIPs xcap_client module or
> OpenSIPS presence module itself when "integrated_xcap") is responsible
> to understand the conditions appearing in the pres-rules documents,
> i.e: from 9:00 to 12:00 show me as busy.
> Am I right?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
>