[OpenSIPS-Users] next_branch function, NAT and PATH (RFC 3327)

[Alex Hermann]

On Monday 25 May 2009, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> >> Alex Hermann wrote:
> >>> Parallel forking seems ok, but in reality it isn't. You just don't
> >>> notice because you use only 1 load-balancer. If the AOR has multiple
> >>> contact registered via multiple load-balancers, all contacts use the
> >>> path of the first contact.
> I already opened a bug for the serial forking part - I'll wait for some
> confirmation from you on the parallel forking part.

It seems my memory failed me. I just checked and the behaviour for parallel 
forking is correct. Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Greetings,

Alex Hermann