[OpenSIPS-Users] Load balancer - how to not change origination ip
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bogdan at voice-system.ro
Thu Jul 9 13:36:42 CEST 2009
Salut Gabriel,
It looks like there is a problem in how you process the CANCEL - do you
do a t_relay() for the received CANCEL ? can you check this at network
level if the received CANCEL is actually sent out to the callee part?
Regards,
Bogdan
Gabriel Georgescu wrote:
> Thank you for your advices!
>
> Regarding the second point I already have a record_route() like below
> which does not help to disconnect ringing calls:
> if (!has_totag()) {
> # initial request
> record_route();
> }
> I also tried like this without success:
>
> if
> (is_method("INVITE"))
>
> record_route();
> I wonder if the creator of the tutorial had same disconnect problems
> and how did he solved it...
>
> Looking into the trace there is a CANCEL received from softphone but
> it is not propagated to the destination server:
>
> Jul 9 12:19:34 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:build_res_buf_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:108, new: 46,
> rest: 700 msg=#012SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress#015#012CSeq: 1
> INVITE#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 192.168.1.36:13308;received=X.136.171.132;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-317a22388e1b1a23-1---d8754z-;rport=61425#015#012From:
> "EyeBeamGG"<sip:Gabi at A.121.254.18>;tag=8a56554d#015#012Call-ID:
> YzE5NjRmMzY4YWVlZDJhMGU5MjdmZTlhNTgxY2MzN2M.#015#012To:
> "101"<sip:101 at A.121.254.18>;tag=0907290911276889507657541#015#012Contact:
> <sip:A.121.254.201:5060;transport=udp>#015#012Content-Type:
> application/sdp#015#012Content-Length: 229#015#012Record-Route:
> <sip:A.121.254.18;lr;ftag=8a56554d;did=0a8.698c41a>#015#012#015#012v=0#015#012o=VoipSwitch
> 8540 8540 IN IP4 A.121.254.201#015#012s=VoipSIP#015#012i=Audio
> Session#015#012c=IN IP4 A.121.254.201#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 7540
> RTP/AVP 18 101#015#012a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000/1#015#012a=rtpmap:101
> telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-15#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012
> Jul 9 12:19:34 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:tm:run_trans_callbacks: trans=0xb5c31df8, callback type 128, id 0
> entered
> Jul 9 12:19:34 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:dialog:next_state_dlg: dialog 0xb5c31c58 changed from state 2 to
> state 2, due event 2
> Jul 9 12:19:34 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:tm:relay_reply:
> sent buf=0x816c2d8: SIP/2.0 1..., shmem=0xb5c344b8: SIP/2.0 1
> Jul 9 12:19:34 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:tm:set_timer:
> relative timeout is 120
> Jul 9 12:19:34 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:tm:insert_timer_unsafe: [1]: 0xb5c31f60 (200)
> Jul 9 12:19:34 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:tm:t_unref:
> UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0
> Jul 9 12:19:34 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
> Jul 9 12:19:34 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:core:receive_msg:
> cleaning up
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:core:parse_msg:
> SIP Request:
> *Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:core:parse_msg:
> method: <CANCEL>
> *Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:core:parse_msg:
> uri: <sip:101 at A.121.254.18>
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:core:parse_msg:
> version: <SIP/2.0>
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=2
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:parse_via_param: found param type 232, <branch> =
> <z9hG4bK-d8754z-317a22388e1b1a23-1---d8754z->; state=6
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:parse_via_param: found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=17
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:core:parse_via:
> end of header reached, state=5
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:parse_headers: via found, flags=2
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:parse_headers: this is the first via
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:core:receive_msg:
> After parse_msg...
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:core:receive_msg:
> preparing to run routing scripts...
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=100
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:core:parse_to:
> end of header reached, state=10
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:core:parse_to:
> display={"101"}, ruri={sip:101 at A.121.254.18}
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:get_hdr_field: <To> [30]; uri=[sip:101 at A.121.254.18]
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:get_hdr_field: to body ["101"<sip:101 at A.121.254.18>#015#012]
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <CANCEL>
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:get_hdr_field: content_length=0
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:get_hdr_field: found end of header
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: max_forwards header not found!
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:uri:has_totag: no
> totag
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:parse_to_param: tag=8a56554d
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:core:parse_to:
> end of header reached, state=29
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:core:parse_to:
> display={"EyeBeamGG"}, ruri={sip:Gabi at A.121.254.18}
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=78
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:tm:t_lookupOriginalT: searching on hash entry 18783
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:tm:matching_3261:
> RFC3261 transaction matched, tid=-d8754z-317a22388e1b1a23-1---d8754z-
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:tm:t_lookupOriginalT: canceled transaction found (0xb5c31df8)!
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:tm:t_lookupOriginalT: REF_UNSAFE: after is 1
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:tm:t_lookupOriginalT: t_lookupOriginalT completed
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:check_via_address: params X.136.171.132, 192.168.1.36, 0
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:sl:run_sl_callbacks: callback id 0 entered
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:siptrace:trace_sl_onreply_out: trace off...
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:tm:t_unref_cell:
> UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]:
> DBG:core:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
> Jul 9 12:19:39 sippc /usr/sbin/opensips[32132]: DBG:core:receive_msg:
> cleaning up
>
>
> At 12:26 AM 7/9/2009, you wrote:
>> 2009/7/8 Gabriel Georgescu <gabrielgeo99 at gmail.com>:
>> > 1. the call arrives at the windows machine with the origination IP
>> > changed to the opensips ip, which makes billing impossible on
>> > windows. In my scenario opensips should only forward/distribute calls
>> > in the simplest way without altering origination ip.
>> > Is there any method to forward the origination IP when doing
>> load_balance?
>>
>> That's impossible, but you can do 2 things if you're billing by ip.
>> Either:
>> - extract the original ip from the Via headers at the next hop, or
>> - do something like append_hf("Orig-IP", "$si"); to append the ip as a
>> new header - the call may be a bit different - check the documentation
>>
>> > 2. a ringing call is not disconnected if the origination party
>> hangs up.
>> > I think it misses a treatement for BYE sent from origination
>> > while call is in "connecting" state.
>> > Any clues how to correct this?
>>
>> Try adding record_route() on an INVITE packet - that way, the rest of
>> the dialog will be passed through your proxy too.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
More information about the Users
mailing list