[OpenSIPS-Users] Behaviour of enum_pv_query

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Carlo,

the pvar option is for giving you liberty to push something else than 
the RURI, but AFAIK, the  username must follow the E164 format, because 
all the ENUM records are published using this format.

Regards,
Bogdan


Carlo Dimaggio wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In my config I'm using enum_pv_query("pvar") instead of enum_query()  
> because all my R-URI are like "00390XXXX" and not "+390XXXX", so I  
> create a pvar without the 00 and with '+'.
> I always receive  "ERROR:enum:enum_pv_query_3: R-URI user is not an  
> E164 number": in fact, my R-URI is not an E164 number... But I don't  
> know why there is such control for R-URI in enum_pv_query_3, I use  
> this function to bypass checking of R-URI!
> Perhaps there is a requirement in E164 RFC?
>
> I would like to understead this behaviour...
>
>
> Thank you!
>
> Carlo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>