[OpenSIPS-Users] parallel forking

[stefanoIT]

That's wonderful! :-)

regards,
stefano


Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> Even if the solution suggested by Inaki is a valid one, it is a terrible 
> hack (storing the RURI in VIA / RR just to get it at reply time) - 
> especially when this information is available in the internal 
> transaction, so it is just a matter of accessing it.
> 
> So, I added a new Pseudo Variable in TM module to give access to the 
> RURI of each outgoing branch: $T_ruri
>         http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.5.x/tm.html#id272609
> 
> This is available in onreply route too, so you can get the RURI of the 
> corresponding branch from there.
> 
> Regards,
> Bogdan
> 
> stefanoIT wrote:
>> Hi Iñaki,
>> you suggestion was brilliant.
>> I can store the uri(s) is avp $(avp(s:uri)[n]) = $ru
>> then put n in via header, and get it on 200 reply.
>> I'll try.
>> Thanks
>>
>> PS I remember that in via header there is alrealy branch number (.1 .2 .3
>> and so on)
>>
>>
>> Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>   
>>> 2009/2/2 stefanoIT <stefano at omnianet.it>:
>>>     
>>>> So there is no a solution to my problem. At the moment.
>>>>       
>>> You can also process each generated branch in "branch_route" and add
>>> the RURI value as Via or Record-Route parameter. For example:
>>>
>>> branch_route[X] {
>>>   add_rr_param(";branch_ruri_user=$rU");
>>>   add_rr_param(";branch_ruri_hostport=$rd:$rp");
>>> }
>>>     
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/parallel-forking-tp2257204p2263112.html
Sent from the OpenSIPS - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.