[OpenSIPS-Users] Dialog information tracing in opensips Issue

Thu Aug 27 10:02:50 CEST 2009

Hello Bogdan,

Thank you for ur attention.

Sorry for inconvenience. I know  "patience is a virtues". But See, I m
trying to solve this problem from almost 1 week. and when I am sending you
the LOG file, I got a mail of moderator Approval. Thats y I have to remove
some of the log.

Anyways, Now I am sending you full call log of OpenSIPs.

Thank you very much.

-Urmi

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro
> wrote:

> Hi Urmi,
>
> some great philosopher said "patience is a virtues" ;).
>
> I took a look at the log you sent and does not seam to be complete. I
> was looking for the processing of 200 OK reply and all I could found was:
>
> Aug 25 16:06:43 [5488] DBG:core:parse_msg: version: <SIP/2.0>
> Aug 25 16:06:43 [5488] DBG:core:parse_msg: status: <200>
> Aug 25 16:06:43 [5488] DBG:core:parse_msg: reason: <OK>
>
>
> nothing following from the 5488 process.......
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
> urmi lakkad wrote:
> > Hello Bogdan,
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> > Here I have attached my OpenSIPs Log. so please find the attachment.
> >
> > -Urmi
> >
> >
> >
> > Looks good - can you post the opensips logs (in debug=6) for this single
> > call ? just to verify.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bogdan
> >
> > urmi lakkad wrote:
> > > Hello Bogdan,
> > >
> > > Thank you for ur response.
> > >
> > > Here with this mail I have _attached my SIP call capture_ using ngrep.
> > > So, please find the attachment. and do needful.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Thanks
> > > Urmi
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> > > <bogdan at voice-system.ro <mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro>
> > <mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro <mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Post the SIP capture of the call you are testing with. Use "ngrep
> > > -d any
> > > . port 5060" to get the capture - this will solve the mystery.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Bogdan
> > >
> > > urmi lakkad wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Can u please suggest me some solution of my problem of DIALLOG
> > > module ?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your attention.
> > > >
> > > > -Urmi
> > > >
> > > > 2009/8/21 urmi lakkad <urmi.lakkad at gmail.com
> > <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>
> > > <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>>
> > > > <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>>>>
> > > >
> > > > Hello Brett,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you very much for quick response.
> > > >
> > > > My calls are working fine. I have checked through SIPp and also
> > > > with Grandstream Phones. The call is working fine with out
> > > > failure. At the time of call, I have started the wireshark to
> > > > capture the packets, but there also I m not getting any negative
> > > > reply like 400 or 300.
> > > >
> > > > See, my call is working fine, call dialog created successfully,
> > > > but after that it destroyed, again new dialog is created n that
> > > > too destroy. For a single call it creates 2 dialogs. But that
> > > > dialog entry is not going to DB. Please suggest me the right thing
> > > > to do.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot for your attention.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Urmi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Brett Nemeroff
> > > > <brett at nemeroff.com <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com>
> > <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com>>
> > > <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com>
> > <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com>>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Urmi,
> > > > You log shows the call having failed. I'm not sure why you
> > > > think it runs for the proper duration. But as far as OpenSIPs
> > > > is concerned, the call failed. It's likely a problem in your
> > > > sipp scenario. It's very possible that sipp thinks the call is
> > > > up, but the proxy does not.
> > > >
> > > > In any case, OpenSIPs is behaving as expected, the call fails,
> > > > the dialog is destroyed.
> > > > Aug 19 17:46:27 [6060] DBG:dialog:next_state_dlg: dialog
> > > > 0x2aaaad55af90 changed from state 1 to state 5, due event 1
> > > > Aug 19 17:46:27 [6060] DBG:dialog:dlg_onreply: dialog
> > > > 0x2aaaad55af90
> > > > failed (negative reply)
> > > >
> > > > BTW, a negative reply is >=400 (or may also include >= 300,
> > > > can't remember). Check your traces, see where that comes from.
> > > > -Brett
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:02 AM, urmi lakkad
> > > > <urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>>
> > > <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello Stanisław Pitucha,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for support.
> > > >
> > > > No, My call is established perfectly and is running for
> > > > the specified duration without fail.
> > > > I m firing the call using SIPp.
> > > >
> > > > Also, the dialog state gives me 1.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for ur attention.
> > > >
> > > > -Urmi
> > > >
> > > > 2009/8/20 Stanisław Pitucha <viraptor at gmail.com
> > <mailto:viraptor at gmail.com>
> > > <mailto:viraptor at gmail.com <mailto:viraptor at gmail.com>>
> > > > <mailto:viraptor at gmail.com <mailto:viraptor at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:viraptor at gmail.com <mailto:viraptor at gmail.com>>>>
> > > >
> > > > 2009/8/20 urmi lakkad <urmi.lakkad at gmail.com
> > <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>
> > > <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>>
> > > > <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>>>>:
> > > > > Am I doing right or not ? If not, please tell me the
> > > > correct way.
> > > > > One more thing, Is my configuration is correct or not ??
> > > >
> > > > It looks like your call doesn't even get accepted:
> > > > Aug 19 17:46:27 [6060] DBG:dialog:next_state_dlg: dialog
> > > > 0x2aaaad55af90 changed from state 1 to state 5, due
> > > > event 1
> > > > Aug 19 17:46:27 [6060] DBG:dialog:dlg_onreply: dialog
> > > > 0x2aaaad55af90
> > > > failed (negative reply)
> > > >
> > > > Maybe you require authentication, or something else?
> > > > Just take care of
> > > > the call not failing first. So far it's rejected
> > > > before an OK answer
> > > > (state 1 is "after sending an INVITE", state 5 is
> > > > "deleted" - more or
> > > > less).
> > > > Capture the traffic and see what's going on.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > >
> > > > Stanisław Pitucha, Gradwell Voip Engineer
> > > >
> > > > T: 01225 800 831 | F: 01225 800 801 | E:
> > > > stan at gradwell.net <mailto:stan at gradwell.net>
> > <mailto:stan at gradwell.net <mailto:stan at gradwell.net>>
> > > <mailto:stan at gradwell.net <mailto:stan at gradwell.net>
> > <mailto:stan at gradwell.net <mailto:stan at gradwell.net>>> |
> > > > www.gradwell.com <http://www.gradwell.com>
> > <http://www.gradwell.com> <http://www.gradwell.com>
> > > >
> > > > Gradwell – Internet for Business People
> > > > Phone Services | Business Broadband | Email & Website
> > > > Hosting
> > > >
> > > > Can switching to VoIP today put some change in your
> > > > pocket?
> > > > Registered Address: 26 Cheltenham Street, Bath, BA2
> > > > 3EX, UK. Company
> > > > Number: 3673235
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at lists.opensips.org
> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090827/e835060b/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: opensips-full-log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 73380 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090827/e835060b/attachment-0001.obj 