[OpenSIPS-Users] Dialog information tracing in opensips Issue
urmi lakkad
urmi.lakkad at gmail.com
Tue Aug 25 13:29:59 CEST 2009
Hello Bogdan,
Thank you very much.
Here I have attached my OpenSIPs Log. so please find the attachment.
-Urmi
Looks good - can you post the opensips logs (in debug=6) for this single
call ? just to verify.
Regards,
Bogdan
urmi lakkad wrote:
> Hello Bogdan,
>
> Thank you for ur response.
>
> Here with this mail I have _attached my SIP call capture_ using ngrep.
> So, please find the attachment. and do needful.
>
>
> -Thanks
> Urmi
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> <bogdan at voice-system.ro <mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro>> wrote:
>
> Post the SIP capture of the call you are testing with. Use "ngrep
> -d any
> . port 5060" to get the capture - this will solve the mystery.
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
> urmi lakkad wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Can u please suggest me some solution of my problem of DIALLOG
> module ?
> >
> > Thank you for your attention.
> >
> > -Urmi
> >
> > 2009/8/21 urmi lakkad <urmi.lakkad at gmail.com
> <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>>>
> >
> > Hello Brett,
> >
> > Thank you very much for quick response.
> >
> > My calls are working fine. I have checked through SIPp and also
> > with Grandstream Phones. The call is working fine with out
> > failure. At the time of call, I have started the wireshark to
> > capture the packets, but there also I m not getting any negative
> > reply like 400 or 300.
> >
> > See, my call is working fine, call dialog created successfully,
> > but after that it destroyed, again new dialog is created n that
> > too destroy. For a single call it creates 2 dialogs. But that
> > dialog entry is not going to DB. Please suggest me the right thing
> > to do.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your attention.
> >
> >
> > -Urmi
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Brett Nemeroff
> > <brett at nemeroff.com <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com>
> <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > Urmi,
> > You log shows the call having failed. I'm not sure why you
> > think it runs for the proper duration. But as far as OpenSIPs
> > is concerned, the call failed. It's likely a problem in your
> > sipp scenario. It's very possible that sipp thinks the call is
> > up, but the proxy does not.
> >
> > In any case, OpenSIPs is behaving as expected, the call fails,
> > the dialog is destroyed.
> > Aug 19 17:46:27 [6060] DBG:dialog:next_state_dlg: dialog
> > 0x2aaaad55af90 changed from state 1 to state 5, due event 1
> > Aug 19 17:46:27 [6060] DBG:dialog:dlg_onreply: dialog
> > 0x2aaaad55af90
> > failed (negative reply)
> >
> > BTW, a negative reply is >=400 (or may also include >= 300,
> > can't remember). Check your traces, see where that comes from.
> > -Brett
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:02 AM, urmi lakkad
> > <urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>
> <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Stanisław Pitucha,
> >
> > Thank you for support.
> >
> > No, My call is established perfectly and is running for
> > the specified duration without fail.
> > I m firing the call using SIPp.
> >
> > Also, the dialog state gives me 1.
> >
> > Thanks for ur attention.
> >
> > -Urmi
> >
> > 2009/8/20 Stanisław Pitucha <viraptor at gmail.com
> <mailto:viraptor at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:viraptor at gmail.com <mailto:viraptor at gmail.com>>>
> >
> > 2009/8/20 urmi lakkad <urmi.lakkad at gmail.com
> <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com <mailto:urmi.lakkad at gmail.com>>>:
> > > Am I doing right or not ? If not, please tell me the
> > correct way.
> > > One more thing, Is my configuration is correct or not ??
> >
> > It looks like your call doesn't even get accepted:
> > Aug 19 17:46:27 [6060] DBG:dialog:next_state_dlg: dialog
> > 0x2aaaad55af90 changed from state 1 to state 5, due
> > event 1
> > Aug 19 17:46:27 [6060] DBG:dialog:dlg_onreply: dialog
> > 0x2aaaad55af90
> > failed (negative reply)
> >
> > Maybe you require authentication, or something else?
> > Just take care of
> > the call not failing first. So far it's rejected
> > before an OK answer
> > (state 1 is "after sending an INVITE", state 5 is
> > "deleted" - more or
> > less).
> > Capture the traffic and see what's going on.
> >
> > --
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Stanisław Pitucha, Gradwell Voip Engineer
> >
> > T: 01225 800 831 | F: 01225 800 801 | E:
> > stan at gradwell.net <mailto:stan at gradwell.net>
> <mailto:stan at gradwell.net <mailto:stan at gradwell.net>> |
> > www.gradwell.com <http://www.gradwell.com> <http://www.gradwell.com>
> >
> > Gradwell – Internet for Business People
> > Phone Services | Business Broadband | Email & Website
> > Hosting
> >
> > Can switching to VoIP today put some change in your
> > pocket?
> > Registered Address: 26 Cheltenham Street, Bath, BA2
> > 3EX, UK. Company
> > Number: 3673235
> >
> > _______________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090825/46478889/attachment-0001.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Opensips-log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 17293 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090825/46478889/attachment-0001.obj
More information about the Users
mailing list