[OpenSIPS-Users] serialize_branches/next_branches problem

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Jeff,

as I suspected, there was something more hiding there....A fix is 
available on SVN - I guess you already know the procedure - update, test 
and if still doesn't work, post the logs.

Thanks and regards,
Bogdan

Jeff Pyle wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> It appears my therapy was not complete. I reinstalled a current build 
> from the devel repository since 1.4.5 was crashing/stopping in weirder 
> ways than 1.5.0. I'm back to having the two Contacts from the 302 
> being sent in parallel. Here are the debugs, the same as before I believe:
>
> DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: resume branch=0
> DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: checking branch=0 (added=0)
> DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: branch=0 is a redirect (added=0)
> DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=7
> DBG:core:get_hdr_field: content_length=0
> DBG:core:get_hdr_field: found end of header
> DBG:uac_redirect:sort_contacts: sort_contacts: 
> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.119.46:5060;user=phone> q=250
> DBG:uac_redirect:sort_contacts: sort_contacts: 
> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone> q=500
> DBG:uac_redirect:shmcontact2dset: adding contact 
> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.119.46:5060;user=phone>
> DBG:uac_redirect:shmcontact2dset: adding contact 
> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone>
> DBG:core:serialize_branches: loaded 
> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.119.46:5060;user=phone>, q=250 q_flag <0>
> DBG:core:serialize_branches: loaded 
> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone>, q=500 q_flag <16>
> DBG:core:next_branches: branch is 
> <sip:+13030000000 at ww.xx.116.46:5060;user=phone>
>
>
> The config looks like this:
>
> failure_route[4] {
> # Un-assign dialog profile
> unset_dlg_profile("outbound", "$avp(s:dlgid_out)");
>
> if (isflagset(18)) exit; # Got a 18x, so route this failure
>
> # Check to see if we've got a permanent failure
> if !(t_check_status("302|403|404|408|500|503|606")) { # Only route 
> advance on these response codes
> exit;
> }
>
> if (t_check_status("302")) {
> resetflag(16); # Clear pre-routing
> setdebug(6);
> if(!get_redirects("*")) {
> route(20); # No redirects, junk the call
> exit;
> }
> serialize_branches(1);
> next_branches();
>
> setdebug(3);
>
> setbflag(3); # 302 in progress
> t_on_failure("4");
> t_on_branch("1");
>
> resetflag(1);
> route(23); # Send request
> }
>
> if (isbflagset(3)) {
> if (next_branches()) {
> t_on_failure("4");
> resetflag(22);
> route(23); # Send request (see below)
> } else {
> resetbflag(3); # The 302's over
> setflag(22); # Make sure there's failure accounting
> route(20); # Done trying, fail the call (t_relay an error)
> }
> }
>
> # some other stuff that isn’t used in this 302 case
> }
>
> route[23] { # Route out
>
> # Check to see if we're at maximum capacity
> if !(get_profile_size("outbound", "$avp(s:dlgid_out)", 
> "$var(dlgsize_out)")) {
> xlog("L_INFO", "Couldn't get dialog size, continuing route-out\n");
> } else {
> # Do some stuff to get to the next PSTN carrier
> }
>
> if (is_avp_set("$avp(s:dlgid_out)")) {
> set_dlg_profile("outbound", "$avp(s:dlgid_out)");
> } else {
> xlog("L_INFO", "No outbound dialog profile value to assign\n");
> }
>
> t_on_reply("1");
> if !(t_relay("0x05")) {
> sl_reply_error();
> }
>
> exit;
> }
>
>
> - Jeff
>
>
>
> On 3/31/09 4:35 AM, "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > Jeff Pyle wrote:
> >> Evidently responding publically to my own question is some sort of cheap
> >> therapy.
> > any therapy that has results is a good one :)
> >
> >> Anyway, I found some old examples of how this is supposed to work,
> >> and all the examples included a t_on_branch() statement. My config 
> did not.
> >> I ripped off one of the examples almost character for character and 
> it is
> >> now behaving as one would expect. Apparently my lack of 
> understanding when
> >> it comes to branch routes was to blame all along.
> >>
> > Can you post the script you got to? Maybe the "misconfiguration" you
> > found is hiding some bug....
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Bogdan