[OpenSIPS-Users] Changes in ACC Modules for 1.5?

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Brett,

I just tried to reproduce what you described - I have a simple setup 
(based on the script) I tried the following configurations:

1) missed_call flag set in the request_route only -> log record generated
2) missed_call flag set in failure_route only -> log record generated
3) missed_call not set at all -> no record.

The scenario was calling to an inexiting server, so an internal 48 was 
generated. The failure_route() was doing only setflag(missed_call).

Regards,
Bogdan

Brett Nemeroff wrote:
> I explicitly sent out a t_reply on failure.
>
> And yes, it seems that I need to set it prior to the failure route.. 
> however, it's before everything in the config now. so I'm not sure 
> really what it needs to be before.. maybe the original t_relay in 
> which the call failed.
>
> BTW, I'm using the dialog module if that changes anything...
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
> <bogdan at voice-system.ro <mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro>> wrote:
>
>     Brett Nemeroff wrote:
>
>         Bogdan,
>         RURI modified by carrierroute, then t_relay(). Far end replies
>         with 503. Call carrierroute again, which errors since the only
>         other route has a prob=0.
>
>     ok, but after the cc fails, you sent out a reply with t_reply() or
>     you let the received 503 to propagate to the UAC?
>
>         Without the failed_transaction_flag actually armed before the
>         failure_route, I get no database activitiy at all..
>
>     so, if you set it before the failure_route it works, otherwise ok,
>     right?
>
>     Regards,
>     Bogdan
>
>
>         Nothing else is using that flag. I have it set at the top of
>         my failure_routes and my main acc flag set at the very top of
>         the main routing block.
>
>
>
>         On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>         <bogdan at voice-system.ro <mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro>
>         <mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro
>         <mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro>>> wrote:
>
>            Hi Brett,
>
>            the transactions you miss in the acc are replied in
>         failure_route
>            with t_reply() or you are passing the received reply ?
>
>            also, are you sharing the "failed_transaction_flag" with
>         other flags ?
>
>            Regards,
>            Bogdan
>
>            Brett Nemeroff wrote:
>
>                Hello All,
>                I'm going to reply to my own message. I'm not sure if the
>                upgrade actually had anything to do with this, but I
>         suspect
>                it did..
>
>                I log everything, failed, missed, acked, etc into one acc
>                table. I was setting the acc flag right at the very
>         very top
>                of my script to just catch everything.
>
>                Well this worked great in 1.4, but in 1.5, it seems that
>                failed transactions were getting skipped...
>
>                I always had the failed_transaction_flag defined, but I
>         only
>                set that flag in my failure route. For some reason, I
>         wasn't
>                getting failed transactions ever.
>
>                It's also notable that I used the carrierroute
>         function, with
>                only one valid route, the secondard route (domain) had a
>                probability of 0 (ie: disabled). That may have
>         contributed to
>                this?
>
>                Anyway, I set the failed transaction flag at the top of the
>                script as well, and it's working how I had expected.
>         Not sure
>                if something else broke when I did that, but my typical
>         call
>                flows seem to be logged properly now.
>
>                -Brett
>
>
>                On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Brett Nemeroff
>                <brett at nemeroff.com <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com>
>         <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com>>
>                <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com>
>         <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com <mailto:brett at nemeroff.com>>>> wrote:
>
>                   Hey All,
>                   So I've recently upgraded my 1.4 install to 1.5 and I've
>                noticed,
>                   I don't get INVITEs that are replied with a 503
>         stored in ACC
>                   anymore, the whole transaction is missing.
>
>                   I used to get those. I haven't changed any of my acc
>         params. :/
>
>                   Am I missing something?
>                   Thanks,
>                   Brett
>
>
>              
>          ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>                _______________________________________________
>                Users mailing list
>                Users at lists.opensips.org
>         <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>         <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org
>         <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>>
>
>                http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>                
>
>
>
>