[OpenSIPS-Users] NAT: Why replacing "Contact" with the received public IP:port instead of adding a parameter with it?

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

2008/11/7 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>:

>> Yes, good idea. If not, the UA will receive a RURI with a URI
>> parameter that it didn't include (maybe it could refuse it?).
>
> That was also my fear. But I checked RFC 3261 and is says for URI comparison
> that parameters which are present only in one URI should be ignored, thus
> the client should accept the URI also with the received parameter. But this
> can done configureable

You are right.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>