[OpenSIPS-Users] NAT: Why replacing "Contact" with thereceivedpublic IP:port instead of adding a parameter with it?

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

2008/11/7 Schumann Sebastian <Sebastian.Schumann at t-com.sk>:
> Hi Inaki
>
> Yes, you are right. Seems my changes work where they should (all same type of phones where modification has to take place, Contact header somehow "well-defined") but are not universal.
>
> I will take your inputs to improve my used functions. Thanks!

I suggest you to study the SIP URI BNF grammar in RFC 3261. It's really complex.

Regards.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>