[OpenSIPS-Users] strange issues with presence messages
Alex G
greekman0000 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 25 18:56:36 CEST 2008
yes. currently am not using the presence module and letting the phones
communicate peer to peer. I have been running a test with 2 phones on public
ips. So far there is no drop in presence communications between these 2
phones. its only happening when 1 or both of the phones are behind nat.
am going to further research by doing more sip captures, but from what I've
seen of current captures I've done, all seems well... its just occasionally
it seems packets that are presence related are not getting through...
am I possibly using the nathelper module incorrectly? or does it not apply
to these notify.subscribe messages for presence?
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Anca Vamanu <anca at voice-system.ro> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Are you talking about 'presence', like 'presence' event or 'dialog;sla'
> event for BLA?
>
> regards,
> Anca Vamanu
>
>
> Alex G wrote:
>
>> On occasion, my polycoms seem to lose the presence state of other phones
>> they are monitoring. It seems to happen randomly and to random phones (some
>> behind nat some on public ips). There is no pattern to when it happens. My
>> phones reregister every 60 seconds, so probably that regreg is issuing new
>> subscribes or refreshing user location which then by defualt starts the
>> message flow again.
>>
>> I tried to write some script to xlog and see if the proxy is recieving the
>> 200 OKs from the messages sent and if not log it. I can't seem to catch them
>> though. I've tried in main route, reply route, branch route, and failute
>> route. They seem to be nowhere that i am looking. Are those replies
>> stateless, therefore I cannot access them or something like that?
>>
>> My suspicion is that some fo the packets are just not getting through and
>> some session timer on the polycoms expires and then the phone makes that
>> contact look like its offline.
>> i think that i saw something in the old openser mailing list about using
>> presence/blf with polycoms. Something about the 200 OKs getting to the proxy
>> before the actual message? Whatever it was my head seems to think it might
>> apply.
>>
>> Does anyone remember that particular post?
>>
>> Is anyone else noticing this with their polycom phones?
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080825/afcbc1e6/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Users
mailing list