[OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] is_uri_user_e164 (#762)

[ferrored]

This is the output you ask:

Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=3
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=9
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=0
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=2
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=4
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=9
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=4
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=5
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=9
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=3
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=1
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=0
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=@

You're right. I copied (c < '0' && c > '9') from the 1.11.5 branch ( It's the only difference between the checks.c files) without thinking .

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/762#issuecomment-172590284
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160118/9d1f316f/attachment.htm>