[OpenSIPS-Devel] [ opensips-Bugs-3603587 ] load_balance does not return next gateway
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Sun Feb 17 09:44:30 CET 2013
Bugs item #3603587, was opened at 2013-02-06 09:14
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bogdan_iancu
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=3603587&group_id=232389
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: modules
Group: 1.9.x
Status: Open
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Matt Williams (hmmhesays)
Assigned to: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu)
Summary: load_balance does not return next gateway
Initial Comment:
Calling load_balance() twice in request route does not return the next gateway in the set.
route[2] {
load_balance("$avp(778)","pstn","1");
xlog("L_DEBUG", "\n===DESTINATION IS $du===\n");
load_balance("$avp(778)","pstn","1");
xlog("L_DEBUG", "\n===DESTINATION IS $du===\n");
if ($retcode<0) {
sl_send_reply("503","Service Unavailable - NO GATEWAYS");
exit;
}
xlog("L_DEBUG","\n===CHECKING RATE LIMIT FOR $du===\n");
if(!rl_check("lb_$du", "0", "TAILDROP")) {
rl_dec_count("lb_$du");
route(2);
exit;
}
xlog("L_DEBUG", "Selected destination is: $du\n");
# send it out
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
exit;
}
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: found requested (0) resource pstn
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:core:parse_to_param: tag=1KppB6yttgg8N
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:core:parse_to: end of header reached, state=29
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:core:parse_to: display={"Datacomm, Tech Support"}, ruri={sip:7015410525 at 192.168.0.195}
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:build_new_dlg: new dialog 0x2b0792991880 (c=3c67be3a-eb22-1230-0184-0014227c3253,f=sip:7015410525 at 192.168.0.195,t=sip:17011231234 at 64.135.116.168:5062,ft=1KppB6yttgg8N) on hash 17929
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:init_leg_info: route_set , contact sip:mod_sofia at 192.168.0.195:5080, cseq 39749097 and bind_addr udp:64.135.116.168:5062
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:dlg_add_leg_info: set leg 0 for 0x2b0792991880: tag=<1KppB6yttgg8N> rcseq=<0>
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:link_dlg: ref dlg 0x2b0792991880 with 3 -> 3
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: destination <sip:192.168.0.172> selected for LB set with free=0 (max=0)
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: destination <sip:192.168.0.170> selected for LB set with free=100 (max=100)
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:link_dlg_profile: Entered here with hash = 1
===DESTINATION IS sip:192.168.0.170===
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: found requested (0) resource pstn
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: destination <sip:192.168.0.172> selected for LB set with free=0 (max=0)
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: destination <sip:192.168.0.170> selected for LB set with free=96 (max=96)
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:link_dlg_profile: Entered here with hash = 1
===DESTINATION IS sip:192.168.0.170===
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:core:comp_scriptvar: int 26 : -5 / 0
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:next_state_dlg: unref dlg 0x2b0792991880 with 1 -> 2
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:next_state_dlg: dialog 0x2b0792991880 changed from state 1 to state 5, due event 1
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:dlg_onreply: dialog 0x2b0792991880 failed (negative reply)
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:unref_dlg: unref dlg 0x2b0792991880 with 1 -> 1
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:unref_dlg: unref dlg 0x2b0792991880 with 1 -> 0
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:unref_dlg: ref <=0 for dialog 0x2b0792991880
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:destroy_dlg: destroing dialog 0x2b0792991880
Feb 6 12:05:23 [620844] DBG:dialog:destroy_dlg: dlg expired or not in list - dlg 0x2b0792991880 [17929:2071505611] with clid '3c67be3a-eb22-1230-0184-0014227c3253' and tags '1KppB6yttgg8N' 'NULL'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu)
Date: 2013-02-17 00:44
Message:
Hi Matt,
This bug is similar to 3604147 , which I just fixed. The marking of the
used destination (during the failover) was bogus if the destination ID was
higher than 8.
SVN is updated trunk, 1.9, 1.8, 1.7 , so please do not use the patch I
sent, update from SVN and try again, it should work now.
Regards,
Bogdan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (bogdan_iancu)
Date: 2013-02-16 01:22
Message:
Hi, I tried your snip , but not able to reproduce what you reported. I
tested with 2 destination, here are the logs from lb module:
Feb 16 11:20:00 [23849] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: found requested
(0) resource pstn
Feb 16 11:20:00 [23849] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: destination
<sip:127.0.0.10> selected for LB set with free=100 (max=100)
Feb 16 11:20:00 [23849] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: destination
<sip:127.0.0.15> selected for LB set with free=100 (max=100)
Feb 16 11:20:00 [23849] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: winning
destination <sip:127.0.0.10> selected for LB set with free=100
....
Feb 16 11:20:00 [23849] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: found requested
(0) resource pstn
Feb 16 11:20:00 [23849] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: sequential call
of LB - previous selected dst is 1
Feb 16 11:20:00 [23849] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: skipping
destination <sip:127.0.0.10> (used=1 , disabled=0)
Feb 16 11:20:00 [23849] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: destination
<sip:127.0.0.15> selected for LB set with free=100 (max=100)
Feb 16 11:20:00 [23849] DBG:load_balancer:do_load_balance: winning
destination <sip:127.0.0.15> selected for LB set with free=100
Please re-run your test with the attached patch which will provide more
debug info - and post here the logs from lb modules.
Thanks and regards,
Bogdan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1086410&aid=3603587&group_id=232389
More information about the Devel
mailing list