[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS-Users] [RFC] What repo to use for 2.0 ?

[Brett Nemeroff]

Bogdan,
I personally really like SVN. It's widely accepted and well documented. I'm
sure that some newer code repo systems offer some really nice features, but
I'm curious what percent of the community has used newer repo types and
would be comfortable using them to their full potential (properly!).

I'm speaking, of course, as a user and not a developer.

Thanks for your consideration. :)

-Brett



On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro
> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> As we are getting closed to first working code for OpenSIPS 2.0 (a proto
> core including config, transport, threading, reactor and dispatcher), we
> will upload the code the public SF repo.
>
> I would like to get some feedback from you about what repo type to use -
> as we have the opportunity to start a fresh new piece of code, we have
> the option to use a different repo than SVN.
>
> SF offers the following options
>    - SVN
>    - git
>    - mercurial
>    - bazaar
>
> Should we keep SVN ? pros ? minuses ? something much better ?
>
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
> PS: should we create a poll on the project web site ?
>
> --
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> www.voice-system.ro
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100302/1b80d469/attachment.htm