[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS-Users] [RFC] What repo to use for 2.0 ?

Norman Brandinger norm at goes.com
Tue Mar 2 20:02:22 CET 2010


I have found that the speed of mercurial seems to be an issue with 
larger sized project.

For example, try downloading adium: hg clone http://hg.adium.im/adium

My vote is for git.

Regards,
Norm

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As we are getting closed to first working code for OpenSIPS 2.0 (a proto 
> core including config, transport, threading, reactor and dispatcher), we 
> will upload the code the public SF repo.
>
> I would like to get some feedback from you about what repo type to use - 
> as we have the opportunity to start a fresh new piece of code, we have 
> the option to use a different repo than SVN.
>
> SF offers the following options
>     - SVN
>     - git
>     - mercurial
>     - bazaar
>
> Should we keep SVN ? pros ? minuses ? something much better ?
>
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
> PS: should we create a poll on the project web site ?
>
>   




More information about the Devel mailing list